Commit 2ffa71fa6971386568b9a29e9dc2f05c188a586a

Authored by bboonnee
1 parent e3cce77c

graphlemon: real agent-memory updates from self-hosting run 11 (validator)

.claude/agent-memory/validator/MEMORY.md
1 - [Self-hosting loop_round probe](project_self_hosting_loop_round_probe.md) — task 14fd9ab6 was a deliberate no-bug probe; verified PASS, no code change is the correct outcome 1 - [Self-hosting loop_round probe](project_self_hosting_loop_round_probe.md) — task 14fd9ab6 was a deliberate no-bug probe; verified PASS, no code change is the correct outcome
2 - [Zero-diff terminal state gap (2nd instance)](project_zero_diff_terminal_state_gap.md) — scheduler.py _BUSY_TIMEOUT_MS comment already present, PASS/no-change; same recurring pipeline gap as org_loop_route.py 2 - [Zero-diff terminal state gap (2nd instance)](project_zero_diff_terminal_state_gap.md) — scheduler.py _BUSY_TIMEOUT_MS comment already present, PASS/no-change; same recurring pipeline gap as org_loop_route.py
  3 +- [deploy_health_check comment resolved + stale-benchmark pattern](project_deploy_health_check_comment_resolved_stale_benchmark.md) — line 24 comment now PASS-verified; a task's benchmark.md can be superseded by that task's own later code_diff/test_report
.claude/agent-memory/validator/project_deploy_health_check_comment_resolved_stale_benchmark.md 0 → 100644
  1 +---
  2 +name: project-deploy-health-check-comment-resolved-stale-benchmark
  3 +description: HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT comment gap (supervisor/deploy_health_check.py:24) is now fixed and PASS-verified; also documents that a task run dir's benchmark.md can be a stale intermediate stage superseded by that same task's later code_diff.patch/test_report.md
  4 +metadata:
  5 + type: project
  6 +---
  7 +
  8 +Task 8ea58a57-b53b-4649-a081-de29ac60347d (`.graphlemon/runs/8ea58a57-.../`) is the 4th
  9 +occurrence of the recurring `supervisor/deploy_health_check.py:24` comment investigation (after
  10 +2x BRD/SDD Planner-only deferrals + this task's own benchmark.md, all citing stale PH5-gating).
  11 +Within this *same* task run directory, generation continued past benchmark.md (13:07) to a real
  12 +Coder fix: code_diff.patch + test_report.md (both 13:12), landed in commit `761681a`
  13 +("auto-commit uncommitted changes for 4377f28d-..."). Independently verified 2026-08-03:
  14 +- `supervisor/deploy_health_check.py:24` now reads `# MVP engineering estimate per 05 §5.9 --
  15 + needs real-world calibration, not an authoritative constant.` directly above
  16 + `HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT = 30`.
  17 +- Diff is exactly the +1 comment line in that file (plus the Coder's own memory-file additions,
  18 + not business logic); sibling constants and docstring untouched.
  19 +- `python3 -m py_compile supervisor/deploy_health_check.py` clean.
  20 +- `python3 -m unittest supervisor.test_deploy_health_check -v` → 11/11 pass.
  21 +- Cross-checked `docs/development-plan.md` myself (not just trusting the Coder's memory claim):
  22 + U-034~U-042 all have dated 实现补充 notes through 2026-08-03, U-042 explicitly marked "PH5
  23 + 收口" (PH5 closure) with a real self-hosting e2e bootstrap that found and fixed real bugs. So
  24 + PH5 is genuinely closed — the "supervisor/ is PH5-gated, decline to edit" reasoning that this
  25 + task's own benchmark.md still cites is stale, and the Coder's override was correct, not a
  26 + guardrail violation.
  27 +
  28 +**Why:** Same root-cause family as [[project-zero-diff-terminal-state-gap]] and
  29 +[[project-self-hosting-loop-round-probe]] — but with an extra wrinkle worth separating out: a
  30 +single task's run directory can contain a `benchmark.md` (or brd.md/sdd.md) describing an
  31 +*earlier* investigation stage's conclusion ("no code changed, none warranted") that is then
  32 +superseded by that same task's *later* artifacts (code_diff.patch/test_report.md) once a
  33 +downstream Coder node re-evaluates the gating rationale and finds it stale. The narrative text of
  34 +an early-stage artifact is not the ground truth for what the task ultimately did — always check
  35 +whether later-timestamped artifacts (code_diff.patch, test_report.md) exist in the same run
  36 +directory before concluding "no changes were made."
  37 +
  38 +**How to apply:** When handed a Benchmark/BRD/SDD narrative claiming "no code changed, PH5-gated,
  39 +declined" for this specific file/line, don't just validate that narrative in isolation — (1) read
  40 +the actual current file state directly (ground truth beats any artifact's prose), (2) check the
  41 +task's run directory (`.graphlemon/runs/<task_id>/`) for later-timestamped code_diff.patch /
  42 +test_report.md that might supersede an earlier-stage artifact within the same task, (3) if a
  43 +PH5-gating claim is load-bearing for the verdict, independently grep `docs/development-plan.md`
  44 +for the relevant Unit's closure notes rather than trusting either the Planner's deferral or the
  45 +Coder's override claim at face value. This specific gap (HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT comment) is
  46 +now closed — verified PASS, do not re-flag or re-edit if it resurfaces again.