benchmark.md 1.14 KB

Edit Raw Blame History


The planner workflow (graphlemon-node-1858572453964d2389959e82e9b2fd3b) completed. It produced a Benchmark/acceptance-test document for the pending task: adding a one-line rationale comment above _BUSY_TIMEOUT_MS = 30000 in src/scheduler.py, cross-referencing (not duplicating) the existing sqlite busy-timeout explanation already in the module docstring (lines 21-28).

Key points from the benchmark:


Scenario 1 (happy path): exactly one added comment line directly above the constant, cross-referencing (not copying) the docstring; _FIX_LOOP_TIMEOUT untouched; py_compile passes.
Scenario 2 (boundary): if the comment is already present, re-running produces a zero-diff result rather than stacking a duplicate comment — this directly addresses the previously-noted "pipeline lacks a zero-diff terminal state" gap for this exact comment-already-present pattern.
Scenario 3 (scope guard): only src/scheduler.py changes, exactly +1 line, no other files/constants touched.


No code was written — this was planner scope only (SDD → Benchmark). The output is ready to hand to a Coder node if the actual edit still needs to be applied.