Commit c8c1548c1c069c502cf77f96617c4c2c3970dafe
1 parent
a6cf3689
graphlemon: benchmark artifact for task 4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b
Showing
1 changed file
with
8 additions
and
0 deletions
.graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/benchmark.md
0 → 100644
| 1 | +The planner workflow (`graphlemon-node-1858572453964d2389959e82e9b2fd3b`) completed. It produced a Benchmark/acceptance-test document for the pending task: adding a one-line rationale comment above `_BUSY_TIMEOUT_MS = 30000` in `src/scheduler.py`, cross-referencing (not duplicating) the existing sqlite busy-timeout explanation already in the module docstring (lines 21-28). | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +Key points from the benchmark: | |
| 4 | +- **Scenario 1 (happy path):** exactly one added comment line directly above the constant, cross-referencing (not copying) the docstring; `_FIX_LOOP_TIMEOUT` untouched; `py_compile` passes. | |
| 5 | +- **Scenario 2 (boundary):** if the comment is already present, re-running produces a zero-diff result rather than stacking a duplicate comment — this directly addresses the previously-noted "pipeline lacks a zero-diff terminal state" gap for this exact comment-already-present pattern. | |
| 6 | +- **Scenario 3 (scope guard):** only `src/scheduler.py` changes, exactly +1 line, no other files/constants touched. | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | +No code was written — this was planner scope only (SDD → Benchmark). The output is ready to hand to a Coder node if the actual edit still needs to be applied. | |
| 0 | 9 | \ No newline at end of file | ... | ... |