-
New skills/work-graph-node-review/SKILL.md documents the methodology for judging a self-planned Work Graph node's output (real structured content vs. narrative prose standing in for it) -- distilled from the real narrative-output incident (docs/todo/validator-test-script-narrative- output-issue.md §6) and the conditional-not-assertive phrasing lesson already applied in _NARRATION_RETRY_HINT. Scoped explicitly against planner-output-review (Planner's fixed doc chain, task-level gate), qa-task-validation (overall task acceptance), and skill-defect-remediation (rewriting a Skill file itself) -- this one judges a single self-planned node's output, nothing broader. Wired into roles/planner_reviewer, roles/coder, roles/validator role.json skills lists. .claude/agents/*.md left untouched -- that's a deploy-time artifact compiled from role.json by agent_profile.deploy_agent_definitions(), not hand-synced (confirmed stale already: coder.md is missing an even earlier Phase 2a skill addition). This completes Phase 2c (§2.1/§2.2/§6/§7.1 all implemented; §7.2's analysis was completed earlier without needing a code change). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
