-
CLAUDE.md is explicit that PH5 (self-modification/auto-rollback) must not start until PH4 has genuinely closed -- not just "all unit tests green," but 06-验收与测试锚点.md's REQ-01~14 happy/boundary/failure cases actually covered. A REQ-by-REQ audit (the same discipline that caught U-031's integration gap) found 5 real gaps: - REQ-03 failure: work_node_execution.status jumped straight running->retrying, skipping 'reflecting' (declared in the schema enum, never once written by any code). - REQ-05 failure / REQ-09 boundary: the "scheduler keeps serving other queued tasks past one blocked_pending_human" scenario was never tested against a real scheduler -- the old test literally said "no scheduler exists yet to test against directly" (stale since U-032). - REQ-06 / REQ-07 / REQ-14 failure (the biggest gap, shared root cause): CorruptPersistedStateError, ClassifierBlockedError, and UsageLimitWaitTimeoutError were each correctly raised and each correctly marked their own work_node_execution 'blocked', but nothing ever routed that to task.status='blocked_pending_human' with the blocked_reason each REQ's acceptance text names. e2e_pipeline.run_end_to_end is split into run_task_lifecycle() so scheduler.py's run_goal_to_completion can create the task itself and catch these three specific exceptions, following the same UPDATE+execution_event pattern budget_guardrail.check_budget() already established for REQ-10. - REQ-02 boundary: PRD internal-contradiction check (verifying->reflecting) had no implementation anywhere -- artifact_write always marked validation_status='passed' unconditionally. Added an optional verify_fn hook to work_graph_orchestrate.run_graph() (one regeneration attempt, then ConsistencyCheckFailedError) and a real consistency-check agent() call scoped to the PRD node only. The first real run of this new call caught a genuine bug: the model returned "consistent": "false" as a JSON string, not a boolean, which `if ok:` silently treated as truthy -- fixed with explicit _coerce_bool(). - REQ-13 failure: minor test-assertion weakness (WS 404 rejection test didn't check the JSON error body). 384 tests green. REQ-01~14 now have real, exercised coverage rather than a "tests are green" assumption -- PH4 can be treated as genuinely closed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
U-031: closes a structural integration gap found during the REQ-01~14 regression audit -- plan_work_graph/execute_work_graph/run_work_node were each individually tested but never actually called together in production code (e2e_pipeline.py's only validated closed loop bypassed all three via flat org_node_trigger calls). Adds work_graph_orchestrate.py (topological sort over graph_manifest + one one-node dynamic-workflow agent() call per Work Node, needed for REQ-06's per-node breakpoint recovery), rewires e2e_pipeline.py's plan_documents/ implement_code onto the real chain, and fixes two bugs a real API run surfaced: graph_manifest's id/node_id/depends_on normalization (work_graph_plan._normalize_graph_manifest) and a missing repo_path in run_work_node's cwd resolution. work_node_run.py also now marks a node 'blocked' instead of leaving it stuck 'running' on any unretryable run_fn exception. U-024.5: the regression audit also found REQ-12's reconnect boundary case (refetch a snapshot after a dropped WS reconnects) was never implemented -- only the dashboard reacted to onStatusChange, and even it never refetched. Fixes mountDashboard/mountTaskBoard/mountTaskDetail (which embeds v_graph_visualizer) to refetch their current snapshot on reconnect. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
Closes the c_artifact_write gap U-011 flagged (03-C §3.7, unowned by any Unit despite REQ-02 needing it directly): src/artifact_write.py writes content to the target project, commits it to the target's own git history, validates depends_on_artifact_ids against existing rows before writing anything (REQ-02's failure case), creates the immutable artifact row. validation_status is set to 'passed' unconditionally -- noted as a real simplification (semantic content review, e.g. REQ-02's "PRD 里出现矛盾" boundary case, needs its own LLM-judgment step this codebase doesn't build yet). src/e2e_pipeline.py orchestrates architecture doc §11's MVP criteria 1-3: plan_documents() makes 4 real sequential Planner calls (BRD, then PRD referencing BRD, then SDD referencing PRD, then Benchmark referencing SDD), writing each via c_artifact_write with correct lineage. implement_code() calls Coder once, captures the resulting `git diff` as code_diff and the Coder's own response as test_report. validate_implementation() calls Validator once and parses an explicit 'VERDICT: PASS|FAIL|INCONCLUSIVE' line. run_end_to_end() chains create_task -> plan -> implement -> validate, using U-010's trigger_org_node_full only for task.status bookkeeping (a lightweight "confirm ready" call per phase) and plain org_node_trigger calls for actual content generation, since trigger_org_node_full's contract returns a status dict, not text. Real-verified: plan_documents ran for real against "实现贪吃蛇游戏" -- all 4 documents produced, correctly lineaged, validation_status=passed, real content (>100 chars each), ~5m45s total for the 4 sequential calls. Deliberately NOT run for real: run_end_to_end's Coder/Validator half (real code generation + real test execution) is a different order of magnitude in cost/time/uncertainty than every other real call this session -- built and mock-tested, but not executed without checking first. 19 new mocked stdlib unittest cases (4 for artifact_write, 5 for the pipeline orchestration, all real/unmocked for artifact_write since git operations are fast/free/local same as U-013's worktree tests) + 1 gated real test. 127 total mocked/real-local tests across U-001-014, all passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>