-
Per CLAUDE.md's docs/ role split (todo = pending, done = shipped into the SDD/code): all seven Graph Engineering series items with a real implementation (B, D, E, F, G, H -- A had no separate doc, resolved directly in graphlemon_architecture.md; C is explicitly won't-do) now have their requirements+design docs moved from docs/todo/ to docs/done/, git mv'd to preserve history. Every cross-reference to the 12 moved files -- across the other moved docs themselves, graph-engineering-open-items.md, 2 Skill files, and 9 src/*.py docstrings/comments -- updated from docs/todo/<file> to docs/done/<file>. Verified no stale docs/todo/ references to any of the 12 filenames remain anywhere in the repo. graph-engineering-open-items.md itself stays in docs/todo/ (not moved) -- it's a living index that keeps gaining new entries from later comparison-note/gap-analysis passes (H itself was added this way, and a new item already appeared while this cleanup was in progress), not a single finished conclusion. Its own header now reflects that all of A/B/D/E/F/G/H are done and explains why it wasn't moved. Also fixed two pre-existing stray path references (missing todo/done/ prefix entirely, predating this cleanup) in its G section. Full src suite (625 tests) passes -- this is a pure documentation/comment change, no behavior touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
Implements docs/todo/dynamic-work-graph-design-skill-design.md. G already answered FR-2 (how to mark a parallel-eligible node group): no new field needed -- topological_layers() infers independence purely from depends_on/edges, so the new Skill's job is just "express real dependencies honestly, don't add fake ones." New Skill skills/design-dynamic-work-graph/SKILL.md: the node-boundary / zero_token-vs-needs_judgment / per-node self-contained task_prompt methodology, wired into agent_profile.py's FRONTMATTER for coder and validator (Planner's own doc-chain path is untouched -- FR-4 only names Coder/Validator). work_graph_plan.py: new _GENERIC_PROMPT_TEMPLATE + generic_node_prompt_builder(), used whenever org_node != 'planner'. Planner keeps its existing fixed brd/prd/sdd/benchmark/... chain (_PROMPT_TEMPLATE) completely unchanged -- zero regression risk to the one real production planning path. Scoped per the requirements doc's non-goal #1 ("prove the mechanism works, don't cover every real scenario yet"): does NOT wire into e2e_pipeline.py::implement_code()'s existing single-node production path. New tests prove the mechanism itself: a Coder scenario that naturally splits into 3 independent modules produces a correctly-shaped graph_manifest, topological_layers() puts all three in one concurrent layer (ties E directly to G), and generic_node_prompt_builder drives it through run_graph() to completion. Full src suite (580 tests) passes with zero regressions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
