-
A merged graph's one run genuinely spans several org_nodes now (Planner/ Coder/Validator all append their own nodes into the SAME run) -- a single run-level org_node column was never accurate once Phase 2b/2c landed, and real per-node ownership already lives in work_node_execution.subagent_type. Schema: work_graph_run.org_node column removed; ux_work_graph_run_active narrowed from UNIQUE(task_id, org_node) to UNIQUE(task_id) WHERE status NOT IN ('done', 'failed') -- 'blocked' now counts as active on purpose, since resuming a blocked run always appends into the same row rather than inserting a fresh one. New migrate_drop_work_graph_run_org_node() handles already-populated databases, wired into backend_server.py's startup path. Call sites updated: work_graph_plan.py/work_graph_fork.py/ root_cause_trace.py's INSERTs; work_graph_run_query.py/task_query.py now return "org_nodes_involved" (derived from work_node_execution.subagent_type) instead of the removed single-value "org_node"; frontend/app.js's org-strip and run-list rendering updated to the list-based shape. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
…76ae-main-checkout-drift
-
Implements docs/todo/work-graph-time-travel-debugging-design.md, backend and console together (user confirmed 2026-08-06). Key finding that shrank the v1 scope: ux_work_graph_run_active is a PARTIAL unique index (only covers non-terminal statuses), not a blanket one -- forking from a parent run that's already reached a terminal status never collides with it at all. v1 restricts forking to exactly that case, so no index/constraint change is needed, only two new nullable columns (parent_run_id, fork_of_node_exec_id). Resolved the requirements doc's FR-1 ambiguity ("override input_payload, re-trigger execution") as OUTPUT SUBSTITUTION instead: the fork point's own output_payload is replaced with the human-supplied content directly, it is never re-executed via a new claude -p call -- only the strict downstream subgraph actually re-runs. This sidesteps reconciling the different build_prompt/input_payload conventions each caller uses (Planner's artifact_type lookup, E's generic task_prompt field, F's jury) -- work_graph_fork.py only needs the persisted graph_manifest and each node's output_payload. Implementation needs ZERO changes to the execution engine: pre-seeding every non-downstream node as a 'done' work_node_execution row before calling the unmodified run_graph() on the unmodified graph_manifest is enough -- run_work_node()'s existing REQ-06 breakpoint-recovery short-circuit (already-'done' nodes return their persisted output without calling run_fn) does all the "reuse without re-executing" work for free. _reconstruct_build_prompt supports two graph shapes generically from persisted state alone (Planner's canonical doc chain via e2e_pipeline._planner_prompt_builder, and E's generic task_prompt field); anything else raises ForkGraphShapeUnsupportedError rather than producing broken prompts. New: src/work_graph_fork.py (create_fork/execute_fork/fork_work_graph_run/ start_fork_in_background, the last splitting fast DB-only setup from slow real execution so an HTTP caller gets run_id back immediately, same pattern task_execution.start_task_execution_in_background already uses). work_graph_run gets parent_run_id/fork_of_node_exec_id (SCHEMA_SQL + migrate_add_work_graph_fork_columns for existing databases). work_graph_run_query.py/task_query.py surface both fields. New endpoint POST /api/work-nodes/:node_exec_id/fork. Console: a "从这里分叉" form on each 'done' node in v_run_detail, a fork badge linking back to the parent run, and a 🔀 marker on v_graph_console's run list -- no diff/merge UI (non-goal #3), read-only branch visibility only. Verified end-to-end for real: started the actual backend, sent a real HTTP fork request, confirmed the new run persisted with correct parent_run_id/fork_of_node_exec_id lineage. Tests cover requirements doc acceptance standards 1-3 (PRD swapped -> SDD/Benchmark genuinely re-execute, BRD untouched; original run completely unaffected; the same node forked twice produces independent branches) plus schema migration idempotency, query-layer field surfacing, the HTTP route, and 3 frontend smoke-test assertions. Full src suite (608 tests) + all 3 frontend smoke tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
Two new console pages requested directly by the user, beyond 02-V's original declared non-goal ("不做完整多项目管理 UI（项目列表/切换）"): - v_project_list: full project list + rename + archive/reactivate. "Import an existing directory with real code" needs no new code -- project_scaffold.create_project() already only ever adds .graphlemon/ inside the target folder. New: src/project_query.py (list/get/update), GET/PUT/DELETE /api/projects[/:id]. DELETE archives (status='archived'), never a physical row delete -- project_id is FK-referenced from task/ artifact/bug_record/etc., and 01-M's own active/archived enum already models this as soft-delete. - v_goal_list: extends the existing v_task_board/v_task_detail rather than duplicating them. Added sort/order to task_query.list_tasks() (column whitelist, no injection surface) and edit/delete on v_task_detail, both restricted to status='queued' (task_query.TaskNotEditableError, HTTP 409) -- editing or deleting a goal after real work has referenced it would leave that history pointing at something that no longer matches reality. Implemented directly rather than through graphlemon's own self-hosting loop -- confirmed with the user first that implement_code() always uses a hardcoded single-node manifest (no plan_work_graph() call for Coder), so a multi-page/multi-endpoint feature like this would've been one unreviewable Coder session with no way to decompose it. Real bug found on first verification pass (not caught by the existing _insert_task test helper, which never writes execution_event): a real task_create.create_task() always writes an execution_event row in the same transaction (01-M's FK, no ON DELETE CASCADE) -- even a never-touched queued task already has one, so DELETE FROM task raised sqlite3.IntegrityError. Fixed by clearing the task's own execution_event rows first; new regression test goes through the real create_task() path. 474 tests green. Verified end-to-end against a real running server (every new endpoint exercised via curl) since the Chrome extension is still unavailable this session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
纯前端 Unit，数据已经在 U-025 的 c_task_get 里，只是 task_query.py 的 _work_nodes_for_run 补上了 hover tooltip 需要但当时没取的字段 （input_schema_ref/output_schema_ref/quota_limit_type/ quota_wait_started_at）。 frontend/app.js 新增 computeGraphLayers()：按 graph_manifest 节点的 depends_on 边做拓扑分层，渲染成按执行层级排布的行，fan-out/fan-in 都能正确分层——用一个 n1→[n2,n3]→n4 的真实 graph_manifest 验证过， 直接从 app.js 里取出 computeGraphLayers 本体（不是重新实现一份逻辑） 跑真实服务器返回的 JSON，分层结果完全正确。节点按 03-C 3.6 节六态 配色，waiting_for_quota 态 hover 展示 quota_limit_type + 已等待时长。 02-V §2.7 原描述还包含一份 Org Graph 层，但 v_task_detail 页面顶部 已有等价的 org-strip 面板，这里判断重复渲染没有意义，只做了 Work Graph DAG 层，Org Graph 复用页面已有的那个。 嵌入位置：v_task_detail 里原来"随 U-026 补上"的占位提示换成了真实 的 DAG 面板。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
-
三个页面需要的读接口此前都不存在，本 Unit 一并建了： - c_task_list/c_task_get（03-C §3.2，此前无 Unit 认领）：新增 src/task_query.py + GET /api/tasks、GET /api/tasks/:task_id。 c_task_get 的返回比 03-C 字面契约更完整——额外带上 work_graph_run（含解析后的 graph_manifest）+ 每个 run 的 work_node_execution 列表，因为 v_task_detail 的 to-do 树需要这份数据， 03-C 已订正补全。 - c_org_loop_route（U-016 已实现 route_org_loop()，从未接 HTTP）第一次 接上 POST /api/tasks/:task_id/route，v_task_detail 的人工干预 （manual_resume）按钮需要它。 - 预算护栏此前没有任何读接口（03-C 只写了 PUT），新增 budget_guardrail.list_budget_configs() + GET /api/settings/budget 给仪表盘预算条用。 frontend/app.js 补上真实的 #/（org graph 三节点卡片、当前任务概要、 预算条、事件时间线，全部通过 c_ws_subscribe 实时刷新）、#/tasks （关键字/状态/org_node 过滤）、#/tasks/:task_id（task 字段、to-do 树、 关联 artifact/bug_record、blocked_pending_human 告警条 + manual_resume 按钮）。路由改成对象形式支持挂载态清理，切页面时关掉上一个页面的 WebSocket 连接。v_graph_visualizer/v_log_viewer 子模块明确标成占位 提示（随 U-026/U-027 补上），不是假造内容。 顺带把 U-023 里因 c_task_list 当时不存在而简化的 related_task_id 换回真下拉，goal_composer/bug_feedback 提交成功后也改回跳转真实的 v_task_detail。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>