• trigger_org_node(org_node, prompt, target_folder_path): shells out
    `claude --agent <org_node> -p ... --permission-mode auto` with cwd=target
    project, parses the JSON result, raises OrgNodeTriggerError on nonzero exit
    or is_error. Skeleton only, per development-plan.md ("不含完整状态机") --
    TASK_NOT_READY/CONCURRENCY_LIMIT_REACHED/USAGE_LIMIT_REACHED handling is
    U-010's job.
    
    Also refactors test_agent_e2e.py (U-004) to call this real function instead
    of its own ad-hoc subprocess invocation, so the gated real-agent test now
    exercises U-005's actual production code path -- confirmed still passing
    against a real `claude --agent planner` call.
    
    5 new mocked stdlib unittest cases (CLAUDE.md Testing constraint: mock the
    subprocess boundary in normal tests). 46 total across U-001-005, all
    passing; the 1 gated real-agent test re-verified manually.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    bboonnee authored
     
    Browse File »
  • Resolves the A-2 assumption with a real `claude --agent planner -p` call
    (--permission-mode auto, $0.05) against a deployed target project: the
    migrated identity comes through correctly, not the default assistant
    persona. Verdict is "部分成立" (partially confirmed), per the criterion
    development-plan.md's U-004 line pre-registered for exactly this outcome --
    Planner/Validator's SOUL.md migrated almost verbatim, but Coder's SOUL.md
    needed real rewriting: the original hardcoded a live Feishu Base API token
    (redacted, never committed), strongly bound its task-claiming to
    `lark-cli`/Base status vocabulary, and told itself to shell out
    `claude --dangerously-skip-permissions` (conflicts directly with 05
    §5.3.1's `auto`-mode decision). All three replaced with graphlemon's own
    task table / c_org_node_trigger / task.status vocabulary.
    
    Also resolves a second, higher-stakes conflict found while scoping this
    Unit: where does `.claude/agents/<org_node>.md` actually live? Architecture
    doc §13.1 says graphlemon's own platform repo; 03-C §3.3 and 05 §5.1 (both
    core SDD, not the architecture PRD) explicitly say the target project --
    matching how Claude Code's --agent flag actually discovers subagents
    (relative to invocation cwd). User confirmed 03-C/05 win. Resolved as two
    different files, not a contradiction: agents/<org_node>/SOUL.md (+
    validator/AGENTS.md) here is the canonical migrated source (01-M 1.9
    agent_profile.soul_file_path, a singleton with no target-project
    reference); src/agent_profile.py compiles that into the deployable
    .claude/agents/<org_node>.md and writes it into a target project via
    deploy_agent_definitions(). Does not reopen the U-002 correction from the
    previous commit -- .graphlemon/ scaffolding and agent deployment are
    different, non-conflicting concerns.
    
    validator's tools/disallowedTools frontmatter encodes qa/AGENTS.md's
    original workspace-permission contract (read-only on source, no git
    mutation commands) as actual Claude Code permissions instead of prose.
    
    14 new stdlib unittest cases (test_agent_profile.py, all real) + 1 gated
    real-agent test (test_agent_e2e.py, RUN_REAL_AGENT_E2E=1, mirrors
    graphloop's pattern per CLAUDE.md's Testing constraint -- this is the first
    Unit that actually shells out to `claude`, so this is also where that
    harness gets built, per the harness-ownership decision from the earlier
    "什么还需要" review). 41 total tests across U-001-004, all passing.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    bboonnee authored
     
    Browse File »