Commit b8cd1f13567e540661463658b0f89016606fea6e
1 parent
93af61db
graphlemon: validator_benchmark artifact for task bfd3ee82-26e5-44d6-8acc-fdbeb3d78185
Showing
1 changed file
with
6 additions
and
3 deletions
.graphlemon/runs/bfd3ee82-26e5-44d6-8acc-fdbeb3d78185/validator_benchmark.md
| 1 | -The graphlemon Work Node (validator) workflow completed. It produced a Benchmark document (验收基准) for the "current project" navigation-bar context feature, covering frontend/index.html, frontend/app.js (parseHashQuery, render, NAV_STATUS_BUCKETS, computeNavStatusBucketCounts, renderNavProjectContextHtml, refreshNavProjectContext, pickInitialTaskBoardStatus, mountTaskBoard), and the new .nav-project-context/.nav-count-* CSS rules. | 1 | +The validator work node workflow finished. It independently authored a validator benchmark for the "控制台导航栏「当前项目」上下文" feature (U-047/U-048 — nav-bar current-project-context work: `frontend/app.js`'s `parseHashQuery`, `renderNavProjectContextHtml`, `refreshNavProjectContext`, status-bucket counting, etc.). |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | -It defines 16 test scenarios (happy path, boundary, failure, and regression), including: nav bar shows project name + 4 status-bucket counts; clicking project name routes to #/projects; single-status buckets pre-filter the task board while multi-status buckets link to an unfiltered #/tasks; empty/no-project state renders nothing; XSS escaping of project names; zero-task projects show all-zero counts; project-switch race-condition guarding via a monotonic request-id; 404/network-failure degradation; hash-query parsing edge cases; nav active-state isolation; and a documented PRD/implementation discrepancy around #/setup. | 3 | +Key points from the benchmark: |
| 4 | +- 8 scenario groups (A–H) covering hash-query parsing, project-name rendering/XSS escaping, status-bucket counts, click-through navigation, race conditions on rapid project switches, and error-handling on backend failures. | ||
| 5 | +- Flags A4 (query-string stripping before route regex matching), B3 (XSS escaping of project name), D2 (multi-status bucket hrefs), E3 (stale-data race), and G2 (overly aggressive failure discarding good data) as the highest-severity scenarios. | ||
| 6 | +- Separates binary pass/fail scenarios from ones requiring a documented judgment call (E4, F3, G3). | ||
| 4 | 7 | ||
| 5 | -This is one step in graphlemon's self-hosting Planner→Coder→Validator loop; no further action is needed unless the user wants to review the full benchmark text. | ||
| 6 | \ No newline at end of file | 8 | \ No newline at end of file |
| 9 | +Working tree is clean — no new commit was created by this run (unlike the git-log pattern of `graphlemon: validator_benchmark artifact for task <uuid>` commits visible in recent history), so persisting/committing this benchmark as a repo artifact is a separate step not performed here. Let me know if you'd like that done. | ||
| 7 | \ No newline at end of file | 10 | \ No newline at end of file |