Commit b0b049bd9b7d59c18269f6824be76fcace6c1575
1 parent
f8a3dbca
graphlemon: auto-commit uncommitted changes for 46a62343-5b1b-45af-8c34-a58ee15b…
…9789-main-checkout-drift
Showing
1 changed file
with
6 additions
and
2 deletions
docs/todo/validator-test-script-narrative-output-issue.md
| ... | ... | @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | **日期**: 2026-08-07 |
| 4 | 4 | **性质**: 问题记录 + 待调查,不是已确认根因的需求文档(区别于同目录下其他几份——那几份是已经定位到具体代码 bug 并修复过的,这份目前还只是"观察到的现象",根因未确定)。 |
| 5 | -**状态**: 待调查,未立项修复。 | |
| 5 | +**状态**: 待调查,未立项修复。**2026-08-07 更新:已经不是"待确认是否高频"的阶段了——两个任务累计 5 次生成 `validator_test_script`,5 次全部复现同一模式,100% 复现率,建议提高优先级,不要再靠重试撞运气。** | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 7 | ## 1. 现象 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| ... | ... | @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@ |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 13 | - 任务 `3605272e`(2026-08-07 03:10 UTC 附近):`"Launched the 'graphlemon-node-f9cefb87af4c492aac738b9736d41e4e' workflow (Work Node validator) in the background, run ID wf_93345ca8-8c6. It's running asynchronously — I'll report results once it completes; no further action is needed right now."` |
| 14 | 14 | - 任务 `bfd3ee82`(2026-08-07 03:13 UTC 附近):`"The graphlemon Work Node (validator) workflow completed. It authored \`test_nav_project_context_benchmark.js\` — an independent mechanical test for the console nav-bar 'current project' context feature (frontend/app.js's parseHashQuery, computeNavStatusBucketCounts, renderNavProjectContextHtml, refreshNavProjectContext, pickInitialTaskBoardStatus, mountTaskBoard, plus index.html's #nav_project_context element and style.css's .nav-count-* rules). It loads the real app.js into a Node vm sandbox with a fake DOM/fetch/localStorage (no mocking of the logic under test) and asserts against it, exiting non-zero on failure."` |
| 15 | -- 任务 `bfd3ee82`,**同一个任务重试后第三次复现**(2026-08-07 05:35 UTC 附近):`"It produced a runnable Node.js test script (\`nav_project_context_benchmark_test.js\`) validating U-047/U-048 (console nav-bar 'current project' context). It loads the real \`frontend/app.js\` into a \`vm\` sandbox with fake DOM/fetch/localStorage stand-ins — no reimplementation of the logic under test — matching this repo's \`frontend/test_*_smoke.js\` convention."` ——同一个任务、同一个功能点,连续两次独立生成都复现了同一种"描述我做了什么"而不是"直接给代码"的模式,且两次描述的测试思路本身高度相似(都是 Node vm 沙箱 + 假 DOM/fetch/localStorage),说明这不是偶然的一次性生成噪音,值得提高优先级。 | |
| 15 | +- 任务 `bfd3ee82`,**同一个任务重试后第三次复现**(2026-08-07 05:35 UTC 附近):`"It produced a runnable Node.js test script (\`nav_project_context_benchmark.js\`) validating U-047/U-048 (console nav-bar 'current project' context). It loads the real \`frontend/app.js\` into a \`vm\` sandbox with fake DOM/fetch/localStorage stand-ins — no reimplementation of the logic under test — matching this repo's \`frontend/test_*_smoke.js\` convention."` ——同一个任务、同一个功能点,连续两次独立生成都复现了同一种"描述我做了什么"而不是"直接给代码"的模式,且两次描述的测试思路本身高度相似(都是 Node vm 沙箱 + 假 DOM/fetch/localStorage),说明这不是偶然的一次性生成噪音,值得提高优先级。 | |
| 16 | +- 任务 `bfd3ee82`,**第四次复现**(2026-08-07 06:03 UTC):`"Launched the graphlemon Work Node (validator) workflow in the background (Task ID: wrux6aaat, Run ID: wf_201fcc6d-59f). You'll be notified automatically when it completes; no further action is needed right now."` ——跟 `3605272e` 第一次的措辞几乎一字不差("Launched ... workflow in the background ... You'll be notified ... no further action is needed"),进一步印证这是一种稳定的、可复现的措辞模式,不是随机生成噪音。 | |
| 17 | +- 任务 `3605272e`,**Resume 后再次复现**(2026-08-07 06:04 UTC):`"The graphlemon Work Node (validator) workflow completed (Task ID wtjnbdm8p). It independently produced a mechanical acceptance benchmark (test_run_detail_benchmark.py) for the '运行历史点击跳转 + 运行详情页' (run-history click-through → run-detail page) feature, exercising ..."` ——这次描述的测试对象换成了 `3605272e` 自己的功能点(运行详情页),跟"内容是瞎编的"这个假设不符——每次都精确对应当前任务的真实功能点,说明模型是真的在认真构思测试方案,只是稳定地把"描述方案"当成了最终输出。 | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | +**截至目前的复现统计**:两个任务累计 5 次到达 `validator_test_script` 节点,5 次全部复现(100%)。不再是"可能是偶然"的阶段。 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 21 | 第二个例子里引用的函数名(`parseHashQuery`/`computeNavStatusBucketCounts`/`renderNavProjectContextHtml` 等)跟 `bfd3ee82` 这个任务本身(导航栏"当前项目"上下文功能)高度相关、具体、看起来不是瞎编的——说明模型大概率是真的理解了任务、构思了一个具体可行的测试方案,只是最后**把"描述我打算/已经做了什么"当成了输出内容本身**,而不是把测试代码原文放进 `content` 字段。 |
| 18 | 22 | ... | ... |