Commit 93b76bdc551dd4df26a62a0333216a75af3221ef
1 parent
e7dd5a35
graphlemon: benchmark artifact for task 8ea58a57-b53b-4649-a081-de29ac60347d
Showing
1 changed file
with
5 additions
and
0 deletions
.graphlemon/runs/8ea58a57-b53b-4649-a081-de29ac60347d/benchmark.md
0 → 100644
| 1 | +The "graphlemon-node-d1afbbd09e784806a77fe4fcddd89c9c" workflow (task wo9y7e9pv, run wf_89251307-bba) completed. It's the same recurring investigation seen in prior sessions (per existing memory): the Planning Agent re-confirmed that supervisor/deploy_health_check.py:24 (HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT = 30) genuinely lacks an inline comment directly above it, but correctly declined to edit the file because supervisor/ is PH5-gated (PH0–PH4 must close first per CLAUDE.md) and the Planning Agent role doesn't write business code regardless of phase. | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | +This run's output was a Benchmark/acceptance-test artifact (Unit U-DHC-COMMENT-01) with six scenarios: a current-state baseline check, happy-path comment placement, scope discipline (sibling constants/docstring must stay untouched), strict "directly above" placement, no unrelated business-logic changes, no fabricated rationale, and explicit PH5-gate-violation as a fail condition. This differs from prior runs of this same underlying task, which produced a BRD and then a full SDD — same root cause and target line identified deterministically each time, but a different artifact type each run. | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | +No code was changed and none was warranted. I updated the existing memory file (project_health_check_timeout_comment_ph5_deferred.md) to log this third recurrence and the artifact-type variance (BRD → SDD → Benchmark) as a note for whoever eventually designs the Org Graph's "correctly deferred, zero-diff" terminal task state. | |
| 0 | 6 | \ No newline at end of file | ... | ... |