Commit 5f7aa28e9877674f8104cf53f59757565d4a682a
1 parent
919828a3
graphlemon: validator_benchmark artifact for task bfd3ee82-26e5-44d6-8acc-fdbeb3d78185
Showing
1 changed file
with
11 additions
and
6 deletions
.graphlemon/runs/bfd3ee82-26e5-44d6-8acc-fdbeb3d78185/validator_benchmark.md
| 1 | -The validator work node workflow finished. It independently authored a validator benchmark for the "控制台导航栏「当前项目」上下文" feature (U-047/U-048 — nav-bar current-project-context work: `frontend/app.js`'s `parseHashQuery`, `renderNavProjectContextHtml`, `refreshNavProjectContext`, status-bucket counting, etc.). | |
| 1 | +The "graphlemon-node-dccaf7f1a5b94726801a0d5db71da176" Work Node (validator) workflow completed successfully (1 agent, ~117s, 0 errors). | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | -Key points from the benchmark: | |
| 4 | -- 8 scenario groups (A–H) covering hash-query parsing, project-name rendering/XSS escaping, status-bucket counts, click-through navigation, race conditions on rapid project switches, and error-handling on backend failures. | |
| 5 | -- Flags A4 (query-string stripping before route regex matching), B3 (XSS escaping of project name), D2 (multi-status bucket hrefs), E3 (stale-data race), and G2 (overly aggressive failure discarding good data) as the highest-severity scenarios. | |
| 6 | -- Separates binary pass/fail scenarios from ones requiring a documented judgment call (E4, F3, G3). | |
| 3 | +It produced an independently-derived QA benchmark for the "控制台导航栏「当前项目」上下文" (console nav bar current-project context) feature — covering `frontend/index.html`'s shared `<nav id="nav">` and `frontend/app.js`'s `refreshNavProjectContext()` / `renderNavProjectContextHtml()` / `computeNavStatusBucketCounts()` / `navBucketHref()` / `parseHashQuery()` plus the client-side task-status aggregation strategy. | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | -Working tree is clean — no new commit was created by this run (unlike the git-log pattern of `graphlemon: validator_benchmark artifact for task <uuid>` commits visible in recent history), so persisting/committing this benchmark as a repo artifact is a separate step not performed here. Let me know if you'd like that done. | |
| 9 | 5 | \ No newline at end of file |
| 6 | +Key contents: | |
| 7 | +- 9 requirements (R1–R9) traced to concrete test scenarios, deliberately not copied from the Planner's/Coder's own benchmark artifact. | |
| 8 | +- Functional scenarios (§2): project selected/zero-tasks/no-project states, click-through routing, 4-bucket status grouping correctness, live count updates on route change, large task-count performance, single vs. multi-status bucket click-through, cross-page consistency, and a race-condition scenario for rapid project switching (stale out-of-order fetch responses must not overwrite newer state). | |
| 9 | +- Backend approach validation (§3): confirms the no-new-endpoint (client-side reduction) design actually works end-to-end and is documented with a concrete revisit threshold. | |
| 10 | +- Regression scenarios (§4): existing parameterized routes and nav "active" highlighting must survive the new query-string parsing capability. | |
| 11 | +- Robustness scenarios (§5): failed project/task fetches degrade cleanly; adversarial (XSS-shaped) project names must never execute as markup. | |
| 12 | +- Explicit non-scenarios (§6) and PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE framing (§7). | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | +No source files were changed and no commit was made in this session — the worktree is clean. This is graphlemon's own self-hosting Validator Work Node; its `content` output is meant to be parsed directly into a file by graphlemon's own pipeline (outside this session), consistent with the prior `graphlemon: validator_benchmark artifact for task ...` commits already in this repo's history. | |
| 10 | 15 | \ No newline at end of file | ... | ... |