Commit 5abfea668997becdbabfd49060cddab64ee53ee3
1 parent
e5bf7c33
graphlemon: benchmark artifact for task 13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2
Showing
1 changed file
with
13 additions
and
0 deletions
.graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/benchmark.md
0 → 100644
| 1 | +The "graphlemon-node-eed773d95d3e48b081da0140be60caa4" workflow (graphlemon Work Node — planner role) completed successfully. | ||
| 2 | + | ||
| 3 | +Task: Unit DOC-FIX-U038-01 — add a one-line explanatory comment above `HEALTH_CHECK_HTTP_TIMEOUT = 10` in `supervisor/deploy_health_check.py`, mirroring the existing comment already present above `HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT`. | ||
| 4 | + | ||
| 5 | +Output: A Benchmark/acceptance-test document (planner role only produces documents, never code) defining 4 pass/fail tests: | ||
| 6 | +1. Happy path — comment added, references SDD §5.9 and the "MVP estimate, needs calibration" caveat, matching the sibling comment's phrasing. | ||
| 7 | +2. Boundary — exactly one line added, nothing else in the file changes. | ||
| 8 | +3. Regression guard — module still imports, constant value (10) unchanged. | ||
| 9 | +4. Anti-recurrence — this exact gap has been flagged by 3 prior planner runs with no Coder ever applying the fix, so closing it requires a fresh file-read verification (not just marking memory resolved) before the Unit counts as done. | ||
| 10 | + | ||
| 11 | +The node independently re-read the file before writing the benchmark and confirmed the comment is still missing as of now (2026-08-03) — consistent with the existing project memory entry (project_http_timeout_comment_missing.md), no drift. | ||
| 12 | + | ||
| 13 | +No code was changed by this run (planner is document-only). The Benchmark defines the acceptance gate; a Coder-role node still needs to apply the actual one-line fix. I asked the user whether to do that now or dispatch it as a separate Coder run, and am awaiting their answer. | ||
| 0 | \ No newline at end of file | 14 | \ No newline at end of file |