Commit 436a05d68791512db6ee46b21aaa6331bead16fa

Authored by graphlemon
1 parent 31b2c541

graphlemon: prd artifact for task 14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb

.graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/prd.md 0 → 100644
  1 +The planner workflow completed. Verdict: no bug exists, no code changes made.
  2 +
  3 +The task targeted a supposed off-by-one bug in `p_org_task_lifecycle`'s `loop_round` check (`> 3` should be `>= 3`). The planner independently re-verified and found:
  4 +
  5 +- `src/org_loop_route.py:102` already uses `>= _LOOP_LIMIT` (limit=3) — correct as-is.
  6 +- `docs/sdd/04-P-流程与状态流转.md:20` spec matches the implementation exactly.
  7 +- `src/test_org_loop_route.py::LoopLimitTest.test_third_route_attempt_at_limit_blocks_and_raises` already covers this exact boundary and passes.
  8 +- The "bug" text traces back to a documentation example (`docs/self-development-feasibility.md`, written 2026-07-30 for a PH5 self-hosting feasibility writeup), later reused verbatim as fixture text in `supervisor/test_self_hosting_e2e.py`'s gated `RealSelfHostingClosedLoopTest` — it was never a real defect report.
  9 +
  10 +The produced PRD formally closes the task as "verified, no code change needed," with zero diffs to `src/` or `docs/sdd/`, explicitly avoids triggering the `RUN_REAL_SELF_HOSTING_E2E=1` gated closed-loop test (that requires separate explicit user authorization per its own docstring), and flags two open questions for human judgment: whether a real self-hosting closed-loop drill should still be run separately, and whether this PRD itself is the intended demonstration of the Planner's fact-checking capability.
  11 +
  12 +No further action was taken — nothing to commit.
0 \ No newline at end of file 13 \ No newline at end of file