宜博 / lemongraph

The background planner workflow (graphlemon-node-9950600a8a804b2f849dcb36e9a8f45d) completed successfully. It produced a Benchmark artifact for a small, well-scoped task: adding a single explanatory comment above _LOOP_LIMIT = 3 in src/org_loop_route.py, documenting that this constant implements the REQ-05/REQ-09 loop-round boundary (loop_round >= _LOOP_LIMIT → blocked_pending_human).

Key points from the benchmark:

• Scope: comment-only change, single file, zero logic/deletion diff.
• 7 acceptance criteria: exactly one new comment line, placed directly above _LOOP_LIMIT = 3, mentioning both REQ-05 and REQ-09 plus blocked_pending_human, using >= (not >) wording to match the real code at line 102, with py_compile passing and _LOOP_LIMIT == 3 unchanged afterward.
• Test scenarios: 1 happy path, 2 boundary checks (no blank line between comment and constant; >= vs > wording precision), and 3 failure/negative checks (wrong file touched, logic accidentally changed, comment missing required refs) — each with a rollback via git checkout -- src/org_loop_route.py.
• Explicitly out of scope: no new test files, no changes to route_org_loop/close_task_done/_manual_resume behavior.

The artifact has not been committed. Following this repo's pattern (one commit per artifact type, visible in recent git log: benchmark, sdd, prd, code_diff, test_report), I can commit it or continue the pipeline, but I'm waiting for explicit user go-ahead before committing or proceeding further, per the project's git safety rules.