test_e2e_pipeline.py
34 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
"""U-014 tests: end-to-end orchestration wiring, mocked at the subprocess
boundary (CLAUDE.md Testing constraint) -- these test that plan_documents/
implement_code/validate_implementation/run_end_to_end call the right things
in the right order and wire artifact lineage/task-status transitions
correctly, not what a real Planner/Coder/Validator would actually produce.
Real coverage (as much of it as is safe/affordable to run) is in
src/test_e2e_pipeline_e2e.py (RUN_REAL_AGENT_E2E=1).
**Rewired 2026-08-01 (U-031 regression audit)**: plan_documents/
implement_code now go through work_graph_plan.plan_work_graph +
work_graph_orchestrate.run_graph (which calls work_graph_execute.
execute_work_graph per node) instead of a flat org_node_trigger.
trigger_org_node call -- see e2e_pipeline.py's module docstring for why.
plan_work_graph is mocked at its own subprocess boundary (same pattern as
test_work_graph_plan.py) so its real graph_manifest-parsing logic and its
real work_graph_run INSERT both still run for real; execute_work_graph is
mocked directly (one level higher than its own subprocess boundary) since
this file's job is testing e2e_pipeline's wiring, not re-proving
execute_work_graph's own mechanics (covered in test_work_graph_execute.py)
or work_graph_orchestrate's own mechanics (test_work_graph_orchestrate.py).
Run: python3 -m unittest src.test_e2e_pipeline -v
"""
import json
import os
import subprocess
import tempfile
import unittest
from unittest.mock import patch
from src import e2e_pipeline, org_node_trigger, project_scaffold, schema, work_graph_execute, work_graph_orchestrate
_FAKE_DOCS = {
"brd": "# BRD\nfake", "prd": "# PRD\nfake", "sdd": "# SDD\nfake", "benchmark": "# Benchmark\nfake",
"test_dataset": "N/A: no natural dataset for this fake goal",
"test_script": "assert True # fake but real, compilable script",
}
_FAKE_GRAPH_MANIFEST = {
"nodes": [
{"node_id": "brd", "artifact_type": "brd", "depends_on": []},
{"node_id": "prd", "artifact_type": "prd", "depends_on": ["brd"]},
{"node_id": "sdd", "artifact_type": "sdd", "depends_on": ["prd"]},
{"node_id": "benchmark", "artifact_type": "benchmark", "depends_on": ["sdd"]},
{"node_id": "test_dataset", "artifact_type": "test_dataset", "depends_on": ["benchmark"]},
{"node_id": "test_script", "artifact_type": "test_script", "depends_on": ["test_dataset"]},
],
"edges": [
{"from": "brd", "to": "prd", "edge_type": "needs_judgment"},
{"from": "prd", "to": "sdd", "edge_type": "needs_judgment"},
{"from": "sdd", "to": "benchmark", "edge_type": "needs_judgment"},
{"from": "benchmark", "to": "test_dataset", "edge_type": "needs_judgment"},
{"from": "test_dataset", "to": "test_script", "edge_type": "needs_judgment"},
],
}
def _fake_plan_subprocess_run(*args, **kwargs):
payload = {"is_error": False, "result": "```json\n" + json.dumps(_FAKE_GRAPH_MANIFEST) + "\n```"}
return subprocess.CompletedProcess(args=["claude"], returncode=0, stdout=json.dumps(payload), stderr="")
def _fake_ready_trigger(org_node, prompt, target_folder_path, timeout=300):
assert prompt == e2e_pipeline._READY_PROMPT
return "Ready."
class PipelineTestBase(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
self.addCleanup(self.tmp.cleanup)
subprocess.run(["git", "init"], cwd=self.tmp.name, check=True, capture_output=True)
self.conn = schema.connect(":memory:")
schema.create_schema(self.conn)
project_scaffold.create_project(self.conn, self.tmp.name, init_git_if_missing=False)
def tearDown(self):
self.conn.close()
class PlanDocumentsTest(PipelineTestBase):
def test_produces_six_artifacts_with_correct_lineage(self):
self.conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO task (task_id, project_id, goal_text, task_type, status, assigned_org_node) "
"VALUES ('task-1', (SELECT project_id FROM project), '实现贪吃蛇游戏', 'goal', "
"'planning_brd_prd_sdd', 'planner')"
)
self.conn.commit()
with patch("src.work_graph_plan.subprocess.run", side_effect=_fake_plan_subprocess_run), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute:
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["brd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["prd"]},
{"consistent": True, "issues": []}, # PRD consistency check (REQ-02 boundary)
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["sdd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["benchmark"]},
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["test_dataset"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["test_script"]},
]
plan_result = e2e_pipeline.plan_documents(self.conn, "task-1", "实现贪吃蛇游戏", self.tmp.name)
artifact_ids = plan_result["artifact_ids"]
self.assertEqual(set(artifact_ids), {"brd", "prd", "sdd", "benchmark", "test_dataset", "test_script"})
prd_deps = json.loads(
self.conn.execute(
"SELECT depends_on_artifact_ids FROM artifact WHERE artifact_id = ?", (artifact_ids["prd"],)
).fetchone()[0]
)
self.assertEqual(prd_deps, [artifact_ids["brd"]])
sdd_deps = json.loads(
self.conn.execute(
"SELECT depends_on_artifact_ids FROM artifact WHERE artifact_id = ?", (artifact_ids["sdd"],)
).fetchone()[0]
)
self.assertEqual(sdd_deps, [artifact_ids["prd"]])
# plan_work_graph's own real work_graph_run INSERT actually ran (not bypassed)
run_row = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT org_node, status FROM work_graph_run WHERE run_id = ?", (plan_result["run_id"],)
).fetchone()
self.assertEqual(run_row, ("planner", "planning"))
def test_earlier_nodes_survive_a_later_node_failing_verification(self):
# 2026-08-07 real incident (docs/todo/work-graph-partial-artifact-
# persistence-requirements.md): test_script fails verify_fn twice
# (original + one regeneration) -- ConsistencyCheckFailedError must
# still propagate (failure semantics unchanged), but BRD/PRD/SDD/
# Benchmark/TestDataset -- all genuinely produced and accepted --
# must be persisted as artifacts, not silently discarded.
self.conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO task (task_id, project_id, goal_text, task_type, status, assigned_org_node) "
"VALUES ('task-1', (SELECT project_id FROM project), 'goal', 'goal', "
"'planning_brd_prd_sdd', 'planner')"
)
self.conn.commit()
# _fake_plan_subprocess_run ignores its args and always returns a
# canned success payload -- fine for the "claude" planning call it's
# meant for, but `patch("src.work_graph_plan.subprocess.run", ...)`
# patches the ONE global `subprocess` module every other importer
# shares too (work_graph_plan does `import subprocess`, not
# `from subprocess import run`), so it would ALSO silently hijack
# check_script_compiles's real `py_compile`/`node --check` calls,
# making them always report success regardless of actual content --
# exactly defeating the failure this test needs to trigger. Only
# intercept the "claude" planning call; let everything else
# (including this test's real compile checks) run for real.
real_subprocess_run = subprocess.run
def _discriminating_fake(*args, **kwargs):
cmd = args[0] if args else kwargs.get("args")
if cmd and cmd[0] == "claude":
return _fake_plan_subprocess_run(*args, **kwargs)
return real_subprocess_run(*args, **kwargs)
with patch("src.work_graph_plan.subprocess.run", side_effect=_discriminating_fake), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute:
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["brd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["prd"]},
{"consistent": True, "issues": []}, # PRD consistency check (REQ-02 boundary)
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["sdd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["benchmark"]},
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["test_dataset"]},
{"content": "this is prose, not a real script"}, # test_script: fails compile check
{"content": "still not real code either"}, # the one regeneration attempt: also fails
]
with self.assertRaises(work_graph_orchestrate.ConsistencyCheckFailedError):
e2e_pipeline.plan_documents(self.conn, "task-1", "goal", self.tmp.name)
rows = self.conn.execute("SELECT artifact_type FROM artifact WHERE task_id = 'task-1'").fetchall()
persisted = {r[0] for r in rows}
self.assertEqual(persisted, {"brd", "prd", "sdd", "benchmark", "test_dataset"})
self.assertNotIn("test_script", persisted)
class RunEndToEndTest(PipelineTestBase):
def test_full_pipeline_wiring(self):
with patch("src.org_node_lifecycle.trigger_org_node", side_effect=_fake_ready_trigger), \
patch("src.work_graph_plan.subprocess.run", side_effect=_fake_plan_subprocess_run), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute, \
patch.object(org_node_trigger, "trigger_org_node", return_value="VERDICT: PASS\nAll scenarios pass."):
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["brd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["prd"]},
{"consistent": True, "issues": []}, # PRD consistency check (REQ-02 boundary)
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["sdd"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["benchmark"]},
{"content": _FAKE_DOCS["test_dataset"]}, {"content": _FAKE_DOCS["test_script"]},
{"response": "Implemented. Ran `pytest`: 3 passed."},
# Validator's OWN independent benchmark/dataset/script (2026-08-06) --
# deliberately different content from the Planner's, to also prove
# nothing here accidentally reuses the Planner's copies.
{"content": "# Validator's own Benchmark\nfake"},
{"content": "N/A: validator judged no dataset needed either"},
{"content": "assert True # validator's own real, compilable script"},
]
result = e2e_pipeline.run_end_to_end(self.conn, self.tmp.name, "实现贪吃蛇游戏")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"]["verdict"], "PASS")
self.assertEqual(
set(result["doc_artifact_ids"]), {"brd", "prd", "sdd", "benchmark", "test_dataset", "test_script"}
)
self.assertEqual(set(result["code_artifact_ids"]), {"code_diff", "test_report"})
task_row = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT status FROM task WHERE task_id = ?", (result["task_id"],)
).fetchone()
self.assertEqual(task_row[0], "validating")
all_artifacts = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM artifact WHERE task_id = ?", (result["task_id"],)
).fetchone()[0]
# brd, prd, sdd, benchmark, test_dataset, test_script, code_diff, test_report,
# validator_benchmark, validator_test_dataset, validator_test_script
self.assertEqual(all_artifacts, 11)
# planner, coder, AND validator (2026-08-06: validator now has its own
# real work_graph_run too, not a flat direct call) each got their own
# work_graph_run (not sharing one)
run_org_nodes = {
row[0] for row in self.conn.execute(
"SELECT org_node FROM work_graph_run WHERE task_id = ?", (result["task_id"],)
).fetchall()
}
self.assertEqual(run_org_nodes, {"planner", "coder", "validator"})
class PrdConsistencyVerifyFnTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""REQ-02 boundary: only the PRD node gets the consistency check."""
def test_non_prd_node_passes_through_without_a_call(self):
node_artifact_types = {"brd": "brd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute:
ok, feedback = verify_fn({"node_id": "brd"}, {"content": "brd text"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertIsNone(feedback)
mock_execute.assert_not_called()
def test_string_false_from_a_real_call_is_not_treated_as_truthy(self):
# regression: a real call (2026-08-02) returned "consistent": "false"
# as a JSON string, not a boolean -- `if "false":` is truthy in
# Python, silently inverting the check until a real test caught it.
node_artifact_types = {"prd": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": "false", "issues": ["contradiction found"]},
):
ok, feedback = verify_fn({"node_id": "prd"}, {"content": "contradictory prd"})
self.assertFalse(ok)
def test_string_true_from_a_real_call_is_treated_as_consistent(self):
node_artifact_types = {"prd": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": "true", "issues": []},
):
ok, feedback = verify_fn({"node_id": "prd"}, {"content": "consistent prd"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
def test_prd_node_triggers_a_real_check_call(self):
node_artifact_types = {"prd": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": False, "issues": ["contradiction found"]},
) as mock_execute:
ok, feedback = verify_fn({"node_id": "prd"}, {"content": "contradictory prd"})
self.assertFalse(ok)
self.assertEqual(feedback, ["contradiction found"])
mock_execute.assert_called_once()
args = mock_execute.call_args[0]
self.assertEqual(args[0], "/tmp/proj-1")
class CheckScriptCompilesTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""2026-08-06: the one mechanical (not LLM-judged) verify_fn -- real,
unmocked subprocess calls to py_compile/node --check, no fixtures to
fake since this is testing an actual compiler's real opinion."""
def test_na_content_passes_without_compiling(self):
ok, detail = e2e_pipeline.check_script_compiles("N/A: this goal has no automatable check")
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertIsNone(detail)
def test_valid_python_passes(self):
ok, detail = e2e_pipeline.check_script_compiles("def test_thing():\n assert 1 + 1 == 2\n")
self.assertTrue(ok)
def test_valid_javascript_passes(self):
ok, detail = e2e_pipeline.check_script_compiles("function testThing() { return 1 + 1; }\n")
self.assertTrue(ok)
def test_narrative_prose_fails_both(self):
# this is the exact failure mode that motivated this check -- a
# narrative sentence about a script, not a real script.
ok, detail = e2e_pipeline.check_script_compiles(
"The graphlemon planner Work Node workflow completed successfully and produced "
"a test script covering 18 scenarios across four areas."
)
self.assertFalse(ok)
self.assertIn("py_compile", detail)
self.assertIn("node --check", detail)
def test_syntactically_broken_python_and_js_fails(self):
ok, detail = e2e_pipeline.check_script_compiles("def broken(:\n this is not valid anything\n")
self.assertFalse(ok)
class TestScriptVerifyFnTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test_non_test_script_node_passes_through_without_compiling(self):
node_artifact_types = {"brd": "brd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._test_script_verify_fn(node_artifact_types)
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "brd"}, {"content": "not even close to code {{{"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertIsNone(detail)
def test_test_script_node_with_broken_content_fails(self):
node_artifact_types = {"script": "test_script"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._test_script_verify_fn(node_artifact_types)
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "script"}, {"content": "this is narrative, not code, no way"})
self.assertFalse(ok)
# regression: work_graph_orchestrate does "; ".join(feedback or []) on
# this return value -- a bare string would get joined character-by-
# character into a garbled reflect prompt (2026-08-06 self-hosting
# incident). Must be a list containing the message, not the message.
self.assertIsInstance(detail, list)
self.assertIn("py_compile", detail[0])
def test_test_script_node_with_real_code_passes(self):
node_artifact_types = {"script": "test_script"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._test_script_verify_fn(node_artifact_types)
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "script"}, {"content": "assert True\n"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
class CombinedPlannerVerifyFnTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Dispatches to the right per-node-type check -- both real checks
(PRD consistency and script-compiles) are exercised elsewhere in
isolation; this only tests the dispatch itself."""
def test_prd_node_dispatches_to_prd_check(self):
node_artifact_types = {"n1": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._combined_planner_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": True, "issues": []},
) as mock_execute:
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "n1"}, {"content": "a prd"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
mock_execute.assert_called_once()
def test_test_script_node_dispatches_to_compile_check(self):
node_artifact_types = {"n1": "test_script"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._combined_planner_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "n1"}, {"content": "not code at all, just words"})
self.assertFalse(ok)
def test_other_node_types_pass_through(self):
node_artifact_types = {"n1": "test_dataset"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._combined_planner_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
ok, detail = verify_fn({"node_id": "n1"}, {"content": "anything at all"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertIsNone(detail)
class PrdConsistencySelfTargetWorktreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""2026-08-03 regression: a real self-hosting run showed _check_prd_
consistency() calling execute_work_graph() directly against
target_folder_path, bypassing worktree isolation entirely -- when
self-targeting, its own agentType='planner'+memory:project call writes
a real, uncommitted change straight to the main checkout's
.claude/agent-memory/planner/MEMORY.md, which then made the NEXT
node's own (correctly worktree-isolated) merge fail with "local
changes would be overwritten by merge". This call must isolate the
same way work_node_run.run_work_node() already does for every other
self-target call."""
def test_self_target_isolates_the_check_in_its_own_worktree(self):
node_artifact_types = {"prd": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/repo")
with patch.object(e2e_pipeline.paths, "is_self_target", return_value=True), \
patch.object(e2e_pipeline.work_node_run, "create_worktree", return_value="/repo/.graphlemon-worktrees/x") as mock_create, \
patch.object(e2e_pipeline.work_node_run, "ensure_worktree_committed") as mock_ensure, \
patch.object(e2e_pipeline.work_node_run, "merge_worktree") as mock_merge, \
patch.object(e2e_pipeline.work_node_run, "remove_worktree") as mock_remove, \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script") as mock_write, \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": True, "issues": []},
) as mock_execute:
ok, feedback = verify_fn({"node_id": "prd"}, {"content": "some prd"})
self.assertTrue(ok)
mock_create.assert_called_once_with("/repo", unittest.mock.ANY)
# both the script write and the real execute call must use the
# WORKTREE path as cwd, never the main checkout, when self-targeting
self.assertEqual(mock_write.call_args[0][0], "/repo/.graphlemon-worktrees/x")
self.assertEqual(mock_execute.call_args[0][0], "/repo/.graphlemon-worktrees/x")
# called twice: once for the worktree itself, once for the main
# checkout (worktrees share project identity, so a real memory
# write can land on the main checkout regardless of cwd -- see
# work_node_run.ensure_worktree_committed's own docstring)
self.assertEqual(mock_ensure.call_count, 2)
ensure_paths = [call.args[0] for call in mock_ensure.call_args_list]
self.assertIn("/repo/.graphlemon-worktrees/x", ensure_paths)
self.assertIn("/repo", ensure_paths)
mock_merge.assert_called_once()
mock_remove.assert_called_once()
def test_non_self_target_does_not_use_a_worktree_at_all(self):
node_artifact_types = {"prd": "prd"}
verify_fn = e2e_pipeline._prd_consistency_verify_fn(node_artifact_types, "/tmp/proj-1")
with patch.object(e2e_pipeline.paths, "is_self_target", return_value=False), \
patch.object(e2e_pipeline.work_node_run, "create_worktree") as mock_create, \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script") as mock_write, \
patch.object(
work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph",
return_value={"consistent": True, "issues": []},
) as mock_execute:
verify_fn({"node_id": "prd"}, {"content": "some prd"})
mock_create.assert_not_called()
self.assertEqual(mock_write.call_args[0][0], "/tmp/proj-1")
self.assertEqual(mock_execute.call_args[0][0], "/tmp/proj-1")
class ValidateImplementationTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test_parses_pass_verdict(self):
with patch("src.org_node_trigger.trigger_org_node", return_value="VERDICT: PASS\nlooks good"):
result = e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation("task-1", "benchmark content", "goal", "/tmp/p")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "PASS")
def test_parses_fail_verdict(self):
with patch("src.org_node_trigger.trigger_org_node", return_value="VERDICT: FAIL\nwall collision broken"):
result = e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation("task-1", "benchmark content", "goal", "/tmp/p")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "FAIL")
def test_no_verdict_line_defaults_to_inconclusive(self):
with patch("src.org_node_trigger.trigger_org_node", return_value="I'm not sure what happened."):
result = e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation("task-1", "benchmark content", "goal", "/tmp/p")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "INCONCLUSIVE")
class RunTestScriptForRealTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""2026-08-06: real, unmocked execution -- these are testing what an
actual interpreter actually does, same reasoning as CheckScriptCompilesTest."""
def setUp(self):
self.tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
self.addCleanup(self.tmp.cleanup)
def test_na_content_is_not_executed(self):
result = e2e_pipeline.run_test_script_for_real(
"N/A: no automatable check for this goal", self.tmp.name, "task-1", "validator_test_script"
)
self.assertFalse(result["ran"])
self.assertIsNone(result["exit_code"])
def test_real_passing_python_script(self):
result = e2e_pipeline.run_test_script_for_real(
"import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n", self.tmp.name, "task-1", "validator_test_script"
)
self.assertTrue(result["ran"])
self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 0)
def test_real_failing_python_script(self):
result = e2e_pipeline.run_test_script_for_real(
"import sys\nsys.exit(1)\n", self.tmp.name, "task-1", "validator_test_script"
)
self.assertTrue(result["ran"])
self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 1)
def test_script_runs_with_real_cwd_so_it_sees_the_real_repo(self):
with open(os.path.join(self.tmp.name, "marker.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("real file")
script = (
"import os, sys\n"
"sys.exit(0 if os.path.exists('marker.txt') else 1)\n"
)
result = e2e_pipeline.run_test_script_for_real(script, self.tmp.name, "task-1", "validator_test_script")
self.assertEqual(result["exit_code"], 0)
def test_materializes_a_real_file_under_graphlemon_runs(self):
e2e_pipeline.run_test_script_for_real(
"import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n", self.tmp.name, "task-42", "validator_test_script"
)
expected = os.path.join(self.tmp.name, ".graphlemon", "runs", "task-42", "validator_test_script.py")
self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(expected))
class ValidateImplementationWithOwnGraphTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""2026-08-06: the safety-critical piece -- a real non-zero exit from
Validator's own script must force FAIL no matter what the LLM's verdict
line says (user-confirmed hard gate)."""
def setUp(self):
self.tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
self.addCleanup(self.tmp.cleanup)
subprocess.run(["git", "init"], cwd=self.tmp.name, check=True, capture_output=True)
self.conn = schema.connect(":memory:")
schema.create_schema(self.conn)
project_scaffold.create_project(self.conn, self.tmp.name, init_git_if_missing=False)
self.conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO task (task_id, project_id, goal_text, task_type, status, assigned_org_node) "
"VALUES ('task-1', (SELECT project_id FROM project), 'goal', 'goal', 'validating', 'validator')"
)
self.conn.commit()
def tearDown(self):
self.conn.close()
def _run(self, script_content, verdict_line):
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute, \
patch.object(org_node_trigger, "trigger_org_node", return_value=verdict_line):
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": "# Validator's own Benchmark"},
{"content": "N/A: no dataset needed"},
{"content": script_content},
]
return e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation_with_own_graph(
self.conn, "task-1", "sdd content", "prd content", "goal text", self.tmp.name,
)
def test_llm_says_pass_and_script_really_passes_stays_pass(self):
result = self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n", "VERDICT: PASS\nlooks good")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "PASS")
self.assertTrue(result["script_execution"]["ran"])
self.assertEqual(result["script_execution"]["exit_code"], 0)
def test_llm_says_pass_but_script_really_fails_is_force_overridden_to_fail(self):
# the exact case the user's hard-gate rule exists for: a script
# that objectively fails must not be argued away by the LLM's own
# verdict line.
result = self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(1)\n", "VERDICT: PASS\nlooks good to me")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "FAIL")
def test_llm_says_fail_and_script_fails_stays_fail(self):
result = self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(1)\n", "VERDICT: FAIL\nreal bug found")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "FAIL")
def test_na_script_leaves_llm_judgment_untouched(self):
result = self._run("N/A: no mechanical check possible", "VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE\nneeds human review")
self.assertEqual(result["verdict"], "INCONCLUSIVE")
self.assertFalse(result["script_execution"]["ran"])
def test_writes_three_validator_artifacts_with_lineage(self):
result = self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n", "VERDICT: PASS\nlooks good")
self.assertEqual(
set(result["artifact_ids"]),
{"validator_benchmark", "validator_test_dataset", "validator_test_script"},
)
script_deps = json.loads(
self.conn.execute(
"SELECT depends_on_artifact_ids FROM artifact WHERE artifact_id = ?",
(result["artifact_ids"]["validator_test_script"],),
).fetchone()[0]
)
self.assertIn(result["artifact_ids"]["validator_benchmark"], script_deps)
self.assertIn(result["artifact_ids"]["validator_test_dataset"], script_deps)
def test_creates_its_own_work_graph_run_row(self):
result = self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n", "VERDICT: PASS\nlooks good")
run_row = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT org_node, status FROM work_graph_run WHERE task_id = 'task-1'"
).fetchone()
self.assertEqual(run_row[0], "validator")
# 2026-08-07 (real incident): this used to stay 'running' forever on
# the happy path -- verify_fn returning ok=True means
# _verify_and_maybe_regenerate never touches work_graph_run.status
# at all, so nothing else in this function's old code ever marked
# it terminal. schema.py's `ux_work_graph_run_active` unique index
# covers exactly this non-terminal status set, so a stuck 'running'
# row silently blocked any later re-verify of the SAME task from
# ever creating its own new validator run.
self.assertEqual(run_row[1], "done")
def test_second_validation_run_does_not_collide_with_the_first(self):
# The actual regression: org_level_loop.run_fix_loop re-verifying
# after a FAIL (or a reconciliation-loop resume retrying) calls this
# function again for the SAME task_id -- must not raise
# "UNIQUE constraint failed: work_graph_run.task_id,
# work_graph_run.org_node" against a first run stuck non-terminal.
self._run("import sys\nsys.exit(1)\n", "VERDICT: FAIL\nreal bug found")
# Benchmark/dataset content must differ from the first call's --
# write_artifact does a real `git commit`, which fails with "nothing
# to commit" if a second write produces byte-identical file content
# (the file path isn't run_id-scoped). Real re-verify runs would
# naturally regenerate slightly different content each time; this
# just makes that explicit rather than accidentally relying on it.
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute, \
patch.object(org_node_trigger, "trigger_org_node", return_value="VERDICT: PASS\nfixed now"):
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": "# Validator's own Benchmark (re-verify)"},
{"content": "N/A: no dataset needed, still"},
{"content": "import sys\nsys.exit(0)\n"},
]
second = e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation_with_own_graph(
self.conn, "task-1", "sdd content", "prd content", "goal text", self.tmp.name,
)
self.assertEqual(second["verdict"], "PASS")
rows = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT status FROM work_graph_run WHERE task_id = 'task-1' ORDER BY rowid"
).fetchall()
self.assertEqual([r[0] for r in rows], ["done", "done"])
def test_earlier_nodes_survive_a_later_node_failing_verification(self):
# 2026-08-07 (same real incident/fix as PlanDocumentsTest's own
# test of this name): validator_test_script fails verify_fn twice
# -- ConsistencyCheckFailedError must still propagate, but
# validator_benchmark/validator_test_dataset (genuinely produced
# and accepted) must be persisted, not discarded along with it.
with patch.object(work_graph_execute, "write_workflow_script"), \
patch.object(work_graph_execute, "execute_work_graph") as mock_execute:
mock_execute.side_effect = [
{"content": "# Validator's own Benchmark"},
{"content": "N/A: no dataset needed"},
{"content": "this is prose, not a real script"}, # fails compile check
{"content": "still not real code either"}, # the one regeneration attempt: also fails
]
with self.assertRaises(work_graph_orchestrate.ConsistencyCheckFailedError):
e2e_pipeline.validate_implementation_with_own_graph(
self.conn, "task-1", "sdd content", "prd content", "goal text", self.tmp.name,
)
rows = self.conn.execute("SELECT artifact_type FROM artifact WHERE task_id = 'task-1'").fetchall()
persisted = {r[0] for r in rows}
self.assertEqual(persisted, {"validator_benchmark", "validator_test_dataset"})
self.assertNotIn("validator_test_script", persisted)
# the work_graph_run itself must NOT be left stuck 'running' either
# (ux_work_graph_run_active would block any later re-verify) --
# _verify_and_maybe_regenerate's own 'blocked' write on this path
# already covers it; confirming it here catches a regression if
# that ever stops being true.
run_status = self.conn.execute(
"SELECT status FROM work_graph_run WHERE task_id = 'task-1'"
).fetchone()[0]
self.assertEqual(run_status, "blocked")
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()