brd.md
1.84 KB
The graphlemon planner workflow (task win4iatkp, run wf_7a8021b9-a6b) completed. It ran one planner agent that audited docs/development-plan.md against docs/sdd/unit_matrix.json and git history, and returned a BRD as its text result — no files were written to disk (git status is clean).
BRD title: "development-plan.md 与 unit_matrix.json 完成状态核对与订正"
Key findings:
- unit_matrix.json has specific stale spots: U-042 (self-hosting E2E) still reads as never really executed despite 13 real self-hosting attempts and a completed real cutover documented in development-plan.md; U-013 is missing a third documented worktree-isolation bug layer; U-014 still claims Coder/Validator full-flow execution is "pending user confirmation" even though it has since been run for real via U-042.
- unit_matrix.json's own meta is internally inconsistent: meta.date/meta.revisions claim only one revision (2026-07-30), but several Units'
donefields already contain content from four later real-world correction rounds (07-31, 08-01, 08-02, 08-03) that were never logged as revisions. - Deferred "cumulative satisfaction" promises in U-009/U-011/U-012/U-013 (happy-path coverage deferred to later units) were actually closed out by U-031/U-042 but never marked closed in either document.
- Shipped §5/§5.1 features (v_project_list, v_goal_list task controls) have zero representation in unit_matrix.json, so any downstream consumer reading only that file would miss them.
- Explicitly out of scope per the BRD: no src/supervisor code changes, no re-litigating already-settled design decisions (A-2 assumption, routed_fast_lane simplification, opus-downgrade boundary, etc.), no CI/automation to prevent future drift.
Next step (not yet done, awaiting direction): apply the corrections to the two files, or save the BRD itself to docs/ if it should persist as an artifact.