The "graphlemon-node-eed773d95d3e48b081da0140be60caa4" workflow (graphlemon Work Node — planner role) completed successfully.
Task: Unit DOC-FIX-U038-01 — add a one-line explanatory comment above HEALTH_CHECK_HTTP_TIMEOUT = 10 in supervisor/deploy_health_check.py, mirroring the existing comment already present above HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT.
Output: A Benchmark/acceptance-test document (planner role only produces documents, never code) defining 4 pass/fail tests:
- Happy path — comment added, references SDD §5.9 and the "MVP estimate, needs calibration" caveat, matching the sibling comment's phrasing.
- Boundary — exactly one line added, nothing else in the file changes.
- Regression guard — module still imports, constant value (10) unchanged.
- Anti-recurrence — this exact gap has been flagged by 3 prior planner runs with no Coder ever applying the fix, so closing it requires a fresh file-read verification (not just marking memory resolved) before the Unit counts as done.
The node independently re-read the file before writing the benchmark and confirmed the comment is still missing as of now (2026-08-03) — consistent with the existing project memory entry (project_http_timeout_comment_missing.md), no drift.
No code was changed by this run (planner is document-only). The Benchmark defines the acceptance gate; a Coder-role node still needs to apply the actual one-line fix. I asked the user whether to do that now or dispatch it as a separate Coder run, and am awaiting their answer.