The graphlemon planner Work Node workflow completed. It investigated a claimed off-by-one bug (loop_round > 3 vs >= 3 in p_org_task_lifecycle) and found the bug does not exist: src/org_loop_route.py:102 already uses >= _LOOP_LIMIT, docs/sdd/04-P-流程与状态流转.md:20 specifies >= 3 consistently, and src/test_org_loop_route.py's LoopLimitTest already covers and passes this exact boundary. The only mention of > 3 is a hypothetical illustrative scenario in docs/self-development-feasibility.md:50 used to argue PH5 self-hosting feasibility, not a real defect report.
Result: no code or doc changes made, no new Development Unit created (correctly avoided manufacturing busywork). It produced a "verified-closed" SDD documenting the fact-check chain, and flagged two open questions for the user to decide rather than deciding itself: (1) whether to still run the gated real self-hosting E2E test (RUN_REAL_SELF_HOSTING_E2E=1), and (2) whether this "checked and found no bug" outcome is itself the desired proof of the Planner's fact-checking capability, or whether the user intended to supply a task with an actual bug for a real fix-and-verify loop.