• 代码层:
    - server/services/goals.js → okr-service.js;GoalsService → OkrService
      · this.goalsDir → okrDir,目录 goals/ → okr/
      · ID 前缀 G- → O-;落盘文件 goal.json → objective.json
      · updateGoal → updateObjective,_nextGoalId/_saveGoal 等同步改名
      · parseNodeId 层级名 ['Goal','Objective','KeyResult','SubTask']
        → ['Objective','KeyResult','SubTask','SubTask'](OKR 无 Goal 这一层)
    - server/routes/goals.js → okr.js;:goalId → :objectiveId
    - 7 处调用点同步:index.js / agent-server.js / agent-chat.js / company.js /
      company-heartbeat-service.js / prompt-builder.js / test-company-e2e.js
    - 前端 OkrDashboard.vue / CompanyDashboard.vue 切到 /api/okr(前后端命名终于一致)
    - bin/lemon.js 新增 okr create/add-node/list/status
    
    向后兼容(不破坏任何现有调用方):
    - /api/goals/* 与 /api/company/:cid/goals/* 全部保留为别名,与新路径同时挂载
    - task dispatch/report 同时接受 objectiveId(新) 与 goalId(旧),写入时两字段都留
    - bin/lemon.js 保留 goal * 命令别名
    
    迁移脚本 scripts/migrate-goals-to-okr.js(npm run okr:migrate):
    - 目录 data/{,companies/*/}goals/ → okr/;条目 G-xxx → O-xxx
    - 改写 objective.json 的 id / nodes 的 key / children 数组、_index.json、
      progress.json 的 goalId、history.log 文本、system/tasklog/*.json 的 goalId+nodeId
    - --dry-run 预演;幂等;迁移前自动备份为 *.bak-goals(已加入 .gitignore)
    - 处理一个反直觉边界:OkrService 构造函数会自动 mkdir 目标目录,"okr/ 已存在"
      不等于"已迁移过"——只要服务被 require 过一次就留下空壳。用 isEmptyOkrDir()
      区分空壳与真实数据,空壳移除后继续迁移。这个 bug 是在 fixture 上验证时发现的。
    - 同样在 fixture 上发现并修掉:nodeId 的值漏改写、tasklog 迁移不幂等
    
    验证:新增 server/tests/unit/okr-service.test.js(7 例,覆盖新命名工作正常 +
    迁移纯函数的 ID 改写);全量 npm run test:unit 652 例全绿。
    
    范围说明:NAMING §五 的 benchmark 三分(skill-/agent-/goal-)本轮未动代码——
    该节自身的建议就是存量保持现状、只对新增代码强制前缀,因为 benchmark_runs 等表
    服务于线上 Arena 排行榜,改表名/路由是另一次独立迁移。
    §二-四 的新 agent id 尚不存在实体,待 P2/P3 实现时按规范创建。
    
    已知遗留(非本次引入):server/scripts/test-company-e2e.js 早已失效——它按
    data/{id}/ 找公司,而 company-service 用的是 data/companies/{id}/,在 HEAD 版本
    同样全部断言失败。本次只同步了其中的 OKR 命名,未修这个路径问题。
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • 改名:task-benchmark / task-test-data / task-test-script
       → goal-benchmark / goal-test-data / goal-test-script
    
    理由(推翻此前"验收标准跟着一次 task 执行走"的论证):关键区分是基数。
    一个人类需求描述 = 1 个 goal,是验收的边界;而 goal 在图中会分解出 N 个 task
    (并行分支、下钻的 sub agent)。验收回答的是"人类想要的东西做到了没有",
    这是 goal 级判定;挂在 task 上会导致"以哪个 task 的验收为准"无法回答。
    
    NAMING §一 作用域表补入 goal / task 两行及其基数定义;§四 重写选型理由;
    §六 增加与 §四 的辨析注(OKR 从 goal 解放后,goal 被重新赋予"人类需求"新义)。
    
    连带:
    - acceptance.json 的键改为 goal_id
    - work_graphs schema 补 goal_id,与 okr_node_id / task_id 并列(三者基数不同,
      分别是 1 / 长周期归属 / N,不能用单一字段表达)
    - 新增 27-REQ R-12 记录本次决策及其推翻关系
    
    修复上一轮的一处失误:全局改名误改了 27-REQ 中的原话引用(R-10 一度被改成
    "goal-benchmark 或者 goal-benchmark")。原文照搬文档不得被批量替换触及,已还原。
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • 此前 27 系列全部是对用户需求的转述与结构化解读,原话一句都没留存
    (搜 "judge-loop-jump"、"元 agent 架构来继承生成" 等关键短语均 0 命中)。
    转述会漂移,出现"当初到底怎么说的"争议时缺少可回溯的依据。
    
    格式与定位对齐仓库既有惯例 docs/prd/newfunction/_spec/requirement.md
    (DevLoop 的原始需求页:"用户提出的需求原话照搬,再做结构化解析")。
    
    内容:11 条需求原话逐条照搬(R-1..R-11),含笔误一律保留
    (validtor / syste agent / intergration / fin in / object-key result),
    每条标注落在哪份文档的哪一节,附"需求 → 设计落点"速查表。
    
    同时记录三处关键推翻关系,便于回溯设计演变:
    - R-7 推翻了"benchmark/test data 是系统基础设施"的误读
    - R-9.1 推翻了 P2 v0.1-v0.3 的静态汇报结构建模及 A/B/C 三个折中方案
    - R-9.4 使跨公司污染风险及其三个缓解方案全部作废
    
    另澄清 27-EXAMPLE 的「配图工厂」是为走查虚构的场景,非用户原始需求。
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • 新增四份文档:
    
    - 27-e2e-task-execution-flow.md — 跨阶段总览:建公司 → 下达任务 → org graph
      逐节点执行 → work graph 规划与循环 → 验收收敛。核心发现:这套流程 70-80%
      已在 docs/prd/newfunction/_spec/ 里被完整设计(DevLoop 的 L1/L2/L3 三层循环、
      BugTriager 四分类归因、分级预算熔断、contract_hash 闸门),DevLoop 实为本
      架构唯一跑通的参考实现,通用引擎应从它抽象而来。
    - 27-example-dev-company-walkthrough.md — 参考场景走查,把架构在一家具体公司
      上跑一遍数(各阶段 JSON 形态、fan-out/fan-in 图、成本估算 ~44 次调用、
      按阻塞程度排序的 8 个断点清单),作为实现靶子与端到端验收场景。
    - 27-naming-conventions.md — 统一命名规范 {作用域}-{职能}。消歧三种 benchmark
      (skill- / agent- / task-);OKR 体系正名(goal → okr,第 1 层 Goal → Objective);
      规划类统一为 orggraph-planning / workgraph-planning / brd-prd-sdd-planning。
    - 27-p3-p4-work-graph-console.md — P3/P4 合并设计:Work Graph 执行引擎(支持
      启动/下一步/暂停/停止/重试,手动与自动共用同一 advance 原语)+ 执行控制台页面。
    
    重写 27-p2-org-graph.md 至 v0.4:Org Graph 从「静态汇报结构」重定位为
    「company 级别生成的 workflow」,与 Work Graph 同构(condition/edge_kind 执行流边),
    两层共用同一套 schema、执行引擎与画布组件。org_graph_edges 从未写入过数据,
    可直接 DROP 重建,零迁移负担;hire() 不再需要 reportsTo(图整体规划整体写入),
    P2 对 company-service.js 的侵入缩至零。
    
    同步修正总纲至 v0.3:Org Graph/Work Graph 术语定义、§3.1 架构图、§3.3 整节;
    标注 P1 已实现(226489d);P6「DevLoop 收编」从「可选」改为「应前置」。
    
    修正三处过期陈述:P1 已实现(非设计稿)、runProject 已完整实现(非 501)、
    UnitsDAG.vue 已实现 Kahn 分波 DAG 渲染(画布应扩展而非重写)。
    并记录一处待处理冲突:graph-service.js:44 已落地的全量唯一索引与 P2 需要的
    部分唯一索引冲突,实现 T1 时必须先 DROP。
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • - New docs/README.md indexes the tree: done/ (shipped features + reference manuals),
      todo/ (current focus — Graph Agent architecture), todo/future/ (deprioritized
      roadmaps: FDE pipeline todo list, stale v1.1 milestones, harness engineering
      proposal — orthogonal to the Graph Agent work, not blocking it)
    - Move completed/reference docs into docs/done/ (LEMONBOSS-SYSTEM-DESIGN, architecture-v5,
      claude-code-cron, open-api-manual, qa_judge_req, task_timeline_design, user-guides/,
      system-design/01-26 minus the three moved to todo/future/) — verified against actual
      code (qa-judge template, Task Timeline route/service/view) before filing as done
    - Fix the two TOC links in LEMONBOSS-SYSTEM-DESIGN.md that would otherwise point at the
      old paths after the move
    - docs/todo/system-design/27-graph-agent-architecture.md: add the P2 Org Graph doc link
      in the roadmap table and 关联文档 section
    - Add docs/todo/system-design/27-p2-org-graph.md (P2 requirements & design, drafted in
      parallel while P0/P1 landed)
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • hire() now checks system_agents (source_kind='template') before provisioning a new
    company agent: if the role has a shared template row, skip copying agent.md and
    instead let AgentManager.getAgentConfig()/PromptBuilder.build() resolve the prompt
    from the shared legacy_path at call time, with per-company context assembled from a
    new company-context.md. Roles without a template row (including the 6 ids that exist
    in both system/agents/ and system/templates/, e.g. evolver-youtube-crawler) fall back
    to the existing full-copy behavior unchanged.
    
    - server/services/graph-service.js (new): lookupSharedAgentMd(), upsertOrgGraphNode()
    - server/services/company-service.js: hire() reference-mode branch, _provisionReferenceAgent()
    - server/src/core/agent-manager.js: getAgentConfig() resolves prompt/companyContextPath
    - server/src/core/prompt-builder.js: build() concatenates company-context.md
    - unit + integration tests covering all 6 acceptance criteria from
      docs/todo/system-design/27-p1-virtual-reference.md §6, including a regression test
      against the real idearun:evolver-youtube-crawler naming-collision case
    
    Full regression suite (587 tests) passes; independent adversarial review found 0
    blocking/major issues.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • Adds server/services/graph-db.js (new data/graph.sqlite: system_agents,
    org_graph_nodes, org_graph_edges) and graph-seed-service.js, which scans
    system/agents/, system/templates/, and data/companies/*/company.json into
    seed rows without touching company-service.js's existing hire/copy path.
    
    Real repo data diverged from the design doc's original estimates (8 not 10
    global agents; 39 not 34 template dirs; system/agents/ and system/templates/
    turn out to share 6 ids describing the "same" agent from two different
    files) — documented in docs/todo/system-design/27-graph-agent-architecture.md
    section 7 for P1/P2 to resolve.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »

  • Before P0 coding begins, the doc set was missing three things that would
    have stalled implementation on day 3:
    
    1. Day-1 Quick-Start (plan-migration top section)
       - 8-step "what command do I type first" walkthrough
       - pnpm install → cp .env.example → extract-manifest verification → P0.0
         services → MOCK_CLAUDE=1 phase0-verify → real phase0-verify → P1
       - Anyone cloning can reach step 4 (doc verification) immediately
    
    2. P0.0 服务层 7 件套 (plan-migration P0 子任务表)
       - Previously P0.A "工具实现" depended on docStore/unitRegistry/sseBroker/
         bugTracker/timelineLogger/pathResolver/GitVault but none were listed
         as a task — engineer would hit "docStore.writePRD doesn't exist"
       - Now P0.0 lists them as a sequenced 4.5-day task: pathResolver first
         (everyone depends on it), then 5 other services, finally GitVault
       - GitVault tasks consolidated into P0.0 (removed duplicate P0.I)
       - Total P0: 13.5 → 17 days (3 → 3.5 weeks)
    
    3. Mock Claude CLI Mode (arch-acp-bridge §⑦, NEW)
       - MOCK_CLAUDE=1 env toggles ClaudeCliProtocol to read stubs from
         system/mock-responses/{agent}/{mode}.json instead of real Claude
       - Mock JSON: array of steps (text emit / tool_use), $pid placeholder
       - When mock vs real: mock for dev + CI, real for prompt quality + P1+
       - Enables zero-token tool dev + phase0-verify
       - Sections renumbered (⑧ → ⑨ etc) to accommodate insertion
    
    Total project: 10 → 10.5 weeks (still honest, still includes everything).
    No new MVCP defs (54). Search index 195.7KB. _spec/ regenerated by hook.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • The 50-page PRD HTML totals ~520KB; loading it all costs Claude ~222K
    tokens just for context. This adds a token-efficient sibling layer:
    
    - scripts/extract-spec.js → npm run spec:extract / spec:check
      Walks docs/prd/newfunction/*.html and produces stripped MD into _spec/.
      Strategy varies per page (full-extract for SDD/process/data,
      shell-strip for agents to keep long system prompts intact).
      Result: 327.9KB MD (~84K tokens) — 38% of full load, saves ~138K tokens
      for every Agent invocation that reads the spec.
    
    - scripts/git-hooks/pre-commit + scripts/install-hooks.sh
      Pre-commit guard: when any docs/prd/newfunction/*.html changes, the
      hook checks the corresponding _spec/*.md is up to date; fails commit
      if stale, telling user to `npm run spec:extract`. Auto-installed via
      package.json `prepare` script on `npm install`.
    
    - docs/prd/newfunction/_spec/ (51 .md files + CONVENTIONS.md)
      Machine-readable mirror of HTML. Used by:
      - Coder/Architect/Tester agents when reading spec at runtime
      - External Claude Code sessions doing reproducibility
      - CI checks (npm run spec:check)
      NOT hand-edited; regenerated from HTML by extract-spec.js.
    
    - CLAUDE.md: 1-line note directing future agents to read _spec/*.md
      preferentially, fall back to *.html only for wireframes/SVG/full
      human-readable context.
    
    This is the user's pre-existing scaffolding that the previous commits
    hadn't pulled in yet. Now tracked + enforced by hook.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • Fills the gap: where does a DevLoop project actually live, and how does a user
    create one? Previous docs assumed everything goes under
    data/companies/{cid}/projects/{pid}/ with no user control.
    
    Design:
    - A DevLoop "project" = one directory + project.json + git history;
      the directory is the project root, the anchor for everything
    - 3 modes:
      - sandbox (default, v1): root auto-generated under data/.../projects/{pid}/
      - linked-new (v1): user picks any empty path, e.g. ~/code/auto-todo
      - linked-existing (v2): bind to existing git repo subdirectory
    - 3 creation entry points:
      - REST: POST /api/devloop/projects with optional {mode, target_path}
      - CLI: scripts/devloop-new.js with --path / --name / --requirement / --list
      - UI: Dashboard "+ NEW PROJECT" modal with mode radio + path picker
    - New pathResolver service (path-resolver.js): single source of truth for
      resolveProjectRoot(pid). All paths derive from it; nothing hardcodes
      data/companies/... anymore
    - linked projects registered in ~/.devloop/linked-projects.json
    - memory stays at company level (~/data/companies/{cid}/memory/) even for
      linked projects — privacy + cross-project knowledge isolation
    - Strict sandbox: blacklist /, /etc, /System, ~/.ssh, ~/.aws etc. for
      target_path; writeAllowList relative to root_path
    
    Pages changed:
    - arch-project-root.html (NEW, 15-section comprehensive design)
    - sdd-model.html       (M-1 ProjectMeta + mode + root_path fields)
    - sdd-control.html     (C-1 POST /projects accepts mode + target_path)
    - assets/shell.js      (sidebar adds arch-project-root)
    - assets/search-index.json + build-manifest.json (rebuilt)
    
    Adds ~2 days to P0 (pathResolver + schema migration), ~1.5 days to P1
    (CLI + mode params), ~1 day to P4 (UI modal). Total 10 → 10.5 weeks.
    
    Key insight: linked-new mode means a user can DevLoop code straight into
    ~/code/auto-todo, then `git push origin main` to ship — without manually
    exporting from the sandbox. The sandbox-vs-linked choice is path-transparent
    to LoopController and all Agents.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • Fills a gap pointed out post-v0.3: docs had file-mtime + history/ archival
    only, no real version control. Now every Agent that completes work triggers
    LoopController to git commit; project ship/sign-off/abandon tag the repo.
    
    Design:
    - One git repo per project at data/companies/{cid}/projects/{pid}/.git
    - LoopController-centralized commits (Agents stay sandboxed, no git access)
    - Commit cadence: each Agent success → commit; Tester red → no commit;
      shipped/sign-off/abandon → tag
    - New GitVault service (C-18): spawn-git wrapper, ~150 lines,
      init/commit/tag/log/diff/status/archive/revert/resetWorkingTree
    - New process P-10 (Process.GitCommit): commitAfterAgent hook in
      callAgentWithPersistence; recoverOnBoot extended to detect dirty trees
    - .gitignore excludes agent-state/ (high-write) + history/ (git is history)
      + stream.log + runs stdout (too large)
    - New SSE events: git.committed · git.tagged · recovery_dirty_tree
    - Defer git push-to-remote to v2 (no network deps in v1)
    
    Pages changed:
    - arch-git-versioning.html (NEW, comprehensive design, 16 sections)
    - sdd-control.html       (+C-18 GitVault spec)
    - sdd-process.html       (+P-10 commitAfterAgent + recoverOnBoot dirty-check)
    - data-layout.html       (.git/ + .gitignore in project tree)
    - plan-migration.html    (P0 +3 days for GitVault, total 10 weeks)
    - assets/shell.js        (sidebar adds arch-git-versioning)
    - assets/search-index.json (rebuilt, 189.5KB, 50 pages)
    - build-manifest.json    (52 → 54 defs, 100% extraction)
    
    Key benefit: Coder 3-retry chain can be `git diff`-ed; L2 fail allows clean
    revert; project export becomes `git archive HEAD` (tracked files only,
    not the ~30MB project dir).
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • Earlier PRD attempt scoped to LemonBoss-only (excludes ArenaSK Skill
    marketplace / Arena / Master / Innovator / Open API / Evolution).
    Generated 2026-05-12, exists side-by-side with the later 50-page
    DevLoop PRD under docs/prd/newfunction/.
    
    Structure:
    - index.html (single-page shell with collapsible sidebar + lunr search)
    - assets/ (app.css/js, chapter.css, menu.js, search-index.json)
    - chapters/01-overview ~ 10-reproducibility (10 chapters)
    - _scan-manifest.json (scope manifest pinning what's in/out)
    - scripts/build-search-index.js (chapter HTML → lunr index)
    
    This commit just brings the existing files under version control;
    no edits to content.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • DevLoop: a 3-layer Loop (L1 Unit / L2 Integration / L3 Human) auto-development
    system that takes a one-line human requirement and produces multi-page HTML
    PRD + SDD + units.json + full backend/frontend code via 6 specialized agents.
    
    This commit adds the complete documentation set:
    
    50 HTML pages organized in 8 sections (3-level menu + global search):
    - 01 Overview · 02 PRD · 03 Design (loops + 6 agents)
    - 04 SDD (MVCP × 4) · 05 Prototype · 06 Architecture
    - 07 API · 08 Ops · 09 Plan
    
    Key specs:
    - 6 agent skills (PM/Architect/Coder/Tester/Integrator/BugTriager), each with
      full system prompt, 13-17 tool signatures, 3 E2E samples, helper source code
    - 52 MVCP definitions, 100% machine-extractable via data-* anchors
    - 79 tool signatures with implementation guidance (arch-tool-registry)
    - ACP bridge spec (arch-acp-bridge): how LoopController calls into LemonBoss
      agent-manager without breaking existing Master/Innovator flows
    - 5-phase plan P0→P4 (~9.5 weeks): P0 bootstrap (tool impl + ACP bridge),
      P1 docs MVP, P2 single unit L1, P3 L1+L2 loop, P4 L3 feedback + UI
    - Persistence layer: AgentState (M-10), Memory (M-11), Todolist (M-12),
      Timeline (M-13), Bugs (M-14), Changelog (M-15) + crash recovery (P-8)
    - Cost & concurrency budgets (plan-cost-concurrency)
    - Code lifecycle: stay-in-sandbox v1 + export API + future GitHub PR (v2)
    
    Plus supporting scripts (zero deps, regex-based):
    - scripts/extract-manifest.js: extracts MVCP defs to build-manifest.json,
      used to verify all definitions have path + shape (currently 100%)
    - scripts/build-search-index.js: builds assets/search-index.json (183KB),
      enables Ctrl+K global search across all 50 pages
    
    The PRD itself is meta-executable: a future Claude Code session reading
    plan-reproducibility.html can rebuild the entire DevLoop runtime from the
    docs alone.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »


  • - Moved data/system/ → system/ (agents, templates, skills, data, workspace)
    - Updated all server route/service path references
    - Updated all script path references
    - Updated all documentation references
    - Restructured .gitignore for cleaner system/ vs data/ boundary
    
    system/ = platform-shared assets (system agents, template library)
    data/ = tenant-specific company instance data
    Yi Bo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • - Add TaskTimeline.vue: two-pane dashboard with task list + message timeline
    - Add task-service.js: aggregate cross-agent conversations into task tree
      - 4-strategy parent-child inference (explicit meta, time-overlap, conv→tpl, master→T)
      - Read messages.log for full tool call details (not just history.json)
    - Add tasks.js API routes: GET /api/tasks, GET /api/tasks/:taskId/timeline
    - Mount /api/tasks in agent-server.js
    - Add 'Task Logs' nav entry in AppNav.vue after Templates
    - Support taskId in URL (/tasks/:taskId?) for sharing/bookmarking
    - Add --parent flag to CLI task dispatch for explicit parentTaskId
    - Auto-detect parentTaskId in task/dispatch from sender's active task
    - Add --instructions flag to template train CLI command
    - Update master tools.md with new parameters
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »

  • - CompanyDashboard Goals Tab: upgraded from flat list to full OKR tree view
      with progress bars, node hierarchy, status animations, owner/priority badges
    - ClaudeCliProtocol: added --effort flag support (low=disable thinking)
    - agent-chat.js: per-agent effort config from config.json cli.effort
    - .gitignore: exclude data/companies/, apiconversation/, agent memory/tasks
    - New views: TemplateAgents, JobsPanel, PipelineEditor, SkillsMarket
    - docs/architecture-v5.md: added decision #13 (thinking control)
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »

  • The plugin bootstrap was calling resolveOpenclawDist() synchronously
    at module load time, which crashed the entire server if the optional
    @mas/openclaw-dist package wasn't installed. Now all three call sites
    defer resolution to runtime with try/catch graceful fallback.
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • - Add task transition CLI and API for Context Flush & Hot Swap
    - Enforce strict bash-only tool policy for Base Agents
    - Inject  into system prompt for self-retrying loop
    - Implement Goal node updates on transitions
    - Add P0 Execute pre-approval block (Human-in-the-loop)
    - Track token metrics to billing.log
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »

  • 文档更新:
    - 重写 11-directory-structure.md (data/system/ + data/{companyId}/)
    - 重写 13-api-design.md (100+ 实际 API 端点)
    - 更新 24-company-layer-architecture.md (规划中→已实现, Todo 全标完成)
    - 更新 23-agent-active-heartbeat.md (规划中→已完成)
    - 更新 architecture-v5.md (v5.3, Phase 4-6 新增)
    - 更新 21-fde-pipeline-architecture.md (阈值 90→95, 路径修正)
    - 更新 LEMONBOSS-SYSTEM-DESIGN.md (v2.0, 章节 15-26 索引)
    - 新增 25-bootstrap-mechanism.md (公司自举机制)
    - 新增 26-automated-hiring-orchestration.md (全自动招聘编排)
    
    Bug 修复:
    - fix(server): 修复 body sanitizer 空 body 时未设置 _bodyParsed
      导致 express.json() 重复读取已消费流的 stream-not-readable 错误
    Yi Bo authored
     
    Browse Dir »
  • yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »


  • - Implement OKR GoalsService with hierarchical node tracking
    - Add /api/goals routes and integrate with dispatch/report APIs
    - Create Innovator agent with Hunt→Digest→Evolving pipeline
    - Create Hunter (l3-hunt), Digester (l2-digest), Evolver (evolving) meta agents
    - Copy L1/L2 dependency skills into each agent's .claude/skills/
    - Fix buildSystemPrompt to scan ALL skill subdirectories (critical)
    - Fix agent list sorting: master pinned top, rest by lastActiveAt
    - Rename master-001→master, innovator-001→innovator
    - Establish meta agent output convention: write to target agent dir
    - Add CXO agent base class for management agents
    - Update CEO agent with delegation-first management model
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »

  • - Agent as Micro-Container: each agent lives in data/agents/{id}/ with full encapsulation
    - Persona vs Capability split: agent.md (identity) + .claude/skills/main_skill/SKILL.md (workflow)
    - Conversations co-located: data/agents/{id}/conversations/ replaces global dir
    - Meta Skills renamed: meta_hunt, meta_digest, meta_creator, meta_evolving, meta_benchmark, meta_research
    - Dynamic Hot-Reload: AgentManager.getAgentConfig() falls back to filesystem scan
    - Parallel Sub-Agent orchestration via Promise.all with multi-terminal UI
    - Removed SQLite dependency, global skills/ directory, and legacy conversations/
    - Full architecture docs: 18-local-filesystem-first-agent-encapsulation.md
    yibo authored
     
    Browse Dir »