• system/templates/ 已随 28 号改造整体并入 system/agents/,目录在磁盘和 git 里都已不存在。
    但引用还散在各处,其中几处是 agent 运行时真会照着读写的:
    
    本体提示词(读不到就静默降级,不报错)
      workgraph-planning/agent.md   system/templates/base/ ×3、模板库路径 ×1
      orggraph-planning/agent.md    同上 ×1
      orggraph-planning/tools.md    ×1
      org-innovator/agent.md        四条产出落点 system/templates/weibo-scraper/train/*
    
    skill 代码里的硬编码目标
      evolver-youtube-crawler 的 refactor.js / mock_setup.js / evolve.js 共 4 处
      innovator-hunt/collect_seed.js —— 这处是真 bug 且已发作过:
        写的是裸相对路径 'system/templates/…',相对 cwd 解析,于是在 agent 自己目录下
        造出一棵野生嵌套树 system/agents/innovator-hunt/system/templates/…
        现在改成由 __dirname 推导,不再依赖 cwd(cwd 已经是深度 3 的任务态目录)
    
    图模板契约(work-graph-templates / org-graph-templates 的 README)
      CI 防线的三条规则写的还是「在 system/templates/ 下必须有目录」「在
      system/templates/_registry.json 里必须有条目」,与实际执行的检查已经对不上
    
    DevLoop PRD(13 份 HTML + 重新生成的 52 份 _spec + build-manifest + search-index)
      写的是 system/templates/devloop-pm.md(扁平 .md)。根和形状都错:
      loop-controller.js:166 实际读的是 system/agents/{agentName}/prompt.md。
      按真实形状改,然后跑 spec:extract / extract-manifest / build-search-index 重新生成。
    
    顺带订正两处早于本次改造就已过期的内容:
    - 「避开 6 个命名冲突 id」这条约束列的 digester / evolver / hunter / innovator
      四个 id 根本不存在(早已改名),而它的理由(两个目录下各有一份、内容不同步)
      也已随合并消失。约束保留(元 agent 本来就不该进执行流),理由与清单按实际本体重写。
    - orggraph-planning/agent.md 里「真相源是 company.json.agents[]」——
      28 号起真相源是 company_agents 表,company.json.agents[] 仅作兼容保留。
    
    刻意不动的三类(改了是净损失):
      历史说明   server/ 下解释「原来指向 X、批次 1 并进了 Y」的注释、docs/done/、tasks/
      完成证明   server/tests/ 里断言该目录已不存在的守卫
      运行态记录 未跟踪的 workspace/ conversations/ 与 train/ 下的历次训练报告
    
    新增 server/tests/unit/no-stale-templates-path.test.js 守住活定义这一档:
    扫 system/ 与 fixtures/ 下被 git 跟踪的文件(跟踪=人工维护的定义,
    未跟踪=运行态产物),零例外。带「样本非空」前置断言防 git 失灵时退化成永远通过。
    改坏一处实测能精确点名到文件行号。
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse File »

  • Before P0 coding begins, the doc set was missing three things that would
    have stalled implementation on day 3:
    
    1. Day-1 Quick-Start (plan-migration top section)
       - 8-step "what command do I type first" walkthrough
       - pnpm install → cp .env.example → extract-manifest verification → P0.0
         services → MOCK_CLAUDE=1 phase0-verify → real phase0-verify → P1
       - Anyone cloning can reach step 4 (doc verification) immediately
    
    2. P0.0 服务层 7 件套 (plan-migration P0 子任务表)
       - Previously P0.A "工具实现" depended on docStore/unitRegistry/sseBroker/
         bugTracker/timelineLogger/pathResolver/GitVault but none were listed
         as a task — engineer would hit "docStore.writePRD doesn't exist"
       - Now P0.0 lists them as a sequenced 4.5-day task: pathResolver first
         (everyone depends on it), then 5 other services, finally GitVault
       - GitVault tasks consolidated into P0.0 (removed duplicate P0.I)
       - Total P0: 13.5 → 17 days (3 → 3.5 weeks)
    
    3. Mock Claude CLI Mode (arch-acp-bridge §⑦, NEW)
       - MOCK_CLAUDE=1 env toggles ClaudeCliProtocol to read stubs from
         system/mock-responses/{agent}/{mode}.json instead of real Claude
       - Mock JSON: array of steps (text emit / tool_use), $pid placeholder
       - When mock vs real: mock for dev + CI, real for prompt quality + P1+
       - Enables zero-token tool dev + phase0-verify
       - Sections renumbered (⑧ → ⑨ etc) to accommodate insertion
    
    Total project: 10 → 10.5 weeks (still honest, still includes everything).
    No new MVCP defs (54). Search index 195.7KB. _spec/ regenerated by hook.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse File »
  • Fills the gap: where does a DevLoop project actually live, and how does a user
    create one? Previous docs assumed everything goes under
    data/companies/{cid}/projects/{pid}/ with no user control.
    
    Design:
    - A DevLoop "project" = one directory + project.json + git history;
      the directory is the project root, the anchor for everything
    - 3 modes:
      - sandbox (default, v1): root auto-generated under data/.../projects/{pid}/
      - linked-new (v1): user picks any empty path, e.g. ~/code/auto-todo
      - linked-existing (v2): bind to existing git repo subdirectory
    - 3 creation entry points:
      - REST: POST /api/devloop/projects with optional {mode, target_path}
      - CLI: scripts/devloop-new.js with --path / --name / --requirement / --list
      - UI: Dashboard "+ NEW PROJECT" modal with mode radio + path picker
    - New pathResolver service (path-resolver.js): single source of truth for
      resolveProjectRoot(pid). All paths derive from it; nothing hardcodes
      data/companies/... anymore
    - linked projects registered in ~/.devloop/linked-projects.json
    - memory stays at company level (~/data/companies/{cid}/memory/) even for
      linked projects — privacy + cross-project knowledge isolation
    - Strict sandbox: blacklist /, /etc, /System, ~/.ssh, ~/.aws etc. for
      target_path; writeAllowList relative to root_path
    
    Pages changed:
    - arch-project-root.html (NEW, 15-section comprehensive design)
    - sdd-model.html       (M-1 ProjectMeta + mode + root_path fields)
    - sdd-control.html     (C-1 POST /projects accepts mode + target_path)
    - assets/shell.js      (sidebar adds arch-project-root)
    - assets/search-index.json + build-manifest.json (rebuilt)
    
    Adds ~2 days to P0 (pathResolver + schema migration), ~1.5 days to P1
    (CLI + mode params), ~1 day to P4 (UI modal). Total 10 → 10.5 weeks.
    
    Key insight: linked-new mode means a user can DevLoop code straight into
    ~/code/auto-todo, then `git push origin main` to ship — without manually
    exporting from the sandbox. The sandbox-vs-linked choice is path-transparent
    to LoopController and all Agents.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse File »
  • Fills a gap pointed out post-v0.3: docs had file-mtime + history/ archival
    only, no real version control. Now every Agent that completes work triggers
    LoopController to git commit; project ship/sign-off/abandon tag the repo.
    
    Design:
    - One git repo per project at data/companies/{cid}/projects/{pid}/.git
    - LoopController-centralized commits (Agents stay sandboxed, no git access)
    - Commit cadence: each Agent success → commit; Tester red → no commit;
      shipped/sign-off/abandon → tag
    - New GitVault service (C-18): spawn-git wrapper, ~150 lines,
      init/commit/tag/log/diff/status/archive/revert/resetWorkingTree
    - New process P-10 (Process.GitCommit): commitAfterAgent hook in
      callAgentWithPersistence; recoverOnBoot extended to detect dirty trees
    - .gitignore excludes agent-state/ (high-write) + history/ (git is history)
      + stream.log + runs stdout (too large)
    - New SSE events: git.committed · git.tagged · recovery_dirty_tree
    - Defer git push-to-remote to v2 (no network deps in v1)
    
    Pages changed:
    - arch-git-versioning.html (NEW, comprehensive design, 16 sections)
    - sdd-control.html       (+C-18 GitVault spec)
    - sdd-process.html       (+P-10 commitAfterAgent + recoverOnBoot dirty-check)
    - data-layout.html       (.git/ + .gitignore in project tree)
    - plan-migration.html    (P0 +3 days for GitVault, total 10 weeks)
    - assets/shell.js        (sidebar adds arch-git-versioning)
    - assets/search-index.json (rebuilt, 189.5KB, 50 pages)
    - build-manifest.json    (52 → 54 defs, 100% extraction)
    
    Key benefit: Coder 3-retry chain can be `git diff`-ed; L2 fail allows clean
    revert; project export becomes `git archive HEAD` (tracked files only,
    not the ~30MB project dir).
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse File »
  • DevLoop: a 3-layer Loop (L1 Unit / L2 Integration / L3 Human) auto-development
    system that takes a one-line human requirement and produces multi-page HTML
    PRD + SDD + units.json + full backend/frontend code via 6 specialized agents.
    
    This commit adds the complete documentation set:
    
    50 HTML pages organized in 8 sections (3-level menu + global search):
    - 01 Overview · 02 PRD · 03 Design (loops + 6 agents)
    - 04 SDD (MVCP × 4) · 05 Prototype · 06 Architecture
    - 07 API · 08 Ops · 09 Plan
    
    Key specs:
    - 6 agent skills (PM/Architect/Coder/Tester/Integrator/BugTriager), each with
      full system prompt, 13-17 tool signatures, 3 E2E samples, helper source code
    - 52 MVCP definitions, 100% machine-extractable via data-* anchors
    - 79 tool signatures with implementation guidance (arch-tool-registry)
    - ACP bridge spec (arch-acp-bridge): how LoopController calls into LemonBoss
      agent-manager without breaking existing Master/Innovator flows
    - 5-phase plan P0→P4 (~9.5 weeks): P0 bootstrap (tool impl + ACP bridge),
      P1 docs MVP, P2 single unit L1, P3 L1+L2 loop, P4 L3 feedback + UI
    - Persistence layer: AgentState (M-10), Memory (M-11), Todolist (M-12),
      Timeline (M-13), Bugs (M-14), Changelog (M-15) + crash recovery (P-8)
    - Cost & concurrency budgets (plan-cost-concurrency)
    - Code lifecycle: stay-in-sandbox v1 + export API + future GitHub PR (v2)
    
    Plus supporting scripts (zero deps, regex-based):
    - scripts/extract-manifest.js: extracts MVCP defs to build-manifest.json,
      used to verify all definitions have path + shape (currently 100%)
    - scripts/build-search-index.js: builds assets/search-index.json (183KB),
      enables Ctrl+K global search across all 50 pages
    
    The PRD itself is meta-executable: a future Claude Code session reading
    plan-reproducibility.html can rebuild the entire DevLoop runtime from the
    docs alone.
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
    yibo authored
     
    Browse File »