The "graphlemon-node-d1afbbd09e784806a77fe4fcddd89c9c" workflow (task wo9y7e9pv, run wf_89251307-bba) completed. It's the same recurring investigation seen in prior sessions (per existing memory): the Planning Agent re-confirmed that supervisor/deploy_health_check.py:24 (HEALTH_CHECK_STARTUP_TIMEOUT = 30) genuinely lacks an inline comment directly above it, but correctly declined to edit the file because supervisor/ is PH5-gated (PH0–PH4 must close first per CLAUDE.md) and the Planning Agent role doesn't write business code regardless of phase.

This run's output was a Benchmark/acceptance-test artifact (Unit U-DHC-COMMENT-01) with six scenarios: a current-state baseline check, happy-path comment placement, scope discipline (sibling constants/docstring must stay untouched), strict "directly above" placement, no unrelated business-logic changes, no fabricated rationale, and explicit PH5-gate-violation as a fail condition. This differs from prior runs of this same underlying task, which produced a BRD and then a full SDD — same root cause and target line identified deterministically each time, but a different artifact type each run.

No code was changed and none was warranted. I updated the existing memory file (project_health_check_timeout_comment_ph5_deferred.md) to log this third recurrence and the artifact-type variance (BRD → SDD → Benchmark) as a note for whoever eventually designs the Org Graph's "correctly deferred, zero-diff" terminal task state.