The background planner workflow (graphlemon-node-9950600a8a804b2f849dcb36e9a8f45d) completed successfully. It produced a Benchmark artifact for a small, well-scoped task: adding a single explanatory comment above `_LOOP_LIMIT = 3` in `src/org_loop_route.py`, documenting that this constant implements the REQ-05/REQ-09 loop-round boundary (`loop_round >= _LOOP_LIMIT` → `blocked_pending_human`).

Key points from the benchmark:
- Scope: comment-only change, single file, zero logic/deletion diff.
- 7 acceptance criteria: exactly one new comment line, placed directly above `_LOOP_LIMIT = 3`, mentioning both REQ-05 and REQ-09 plus `blocked_pending_human`, using `>=` (not `>`) wording to match the real code at line 102, with `py_compile` passing and `_LOOP_LIMIT == 3` unchanged afterward.
- Test scenarios: 1 happy path, 2 boundary checks (no blank line between comment and constant; `>=` vs `>` wording precision), and 3 failure/negative checks (wrong file touched, logic accidentally changed, comment missing required refs) — each with a rollback via `git checkout -- src/org_loop_route.py`.
- Explicitly out of scope: no new test files, no changes to `route_org_loop`/`close_task_done`/`_manual_resume` behavior.

The artifact has not been committed. Following this repo's pattern (one commit per artifact type, visible in recent git log: benchmark, sdd, prd, code_diff, test_report), I can commit it or continue the pipeline, but I'm waiting for explicit user go-ahead before committing or proceeding further, per the project's git safety rules.