From efcf600c2f7726d32a1b0168c0d074fc1758284e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: graphlemon Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:49:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] graphlemon: test_report artifact for task 13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2 --- .graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/test_report.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/test_report.md diff --git a/.graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/test_report.md b/.graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/test_report.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..75d1595 --- /dev/null +++ b/.graphlemon/runs/13601943-2489-42f0-a68d-10b2c56312f2/test_report.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +The graphlemon coder work node completed successfully. It applied the one-line fix that three prior Planner runs had proposed but no Coder had executed: added the explanatory comment ("MVP engineering estimate per 05 ยง5.9 -- needs real-world calibration, not an authoritative constant.") directly above `HEALTH_CHECK_HTTP_TIMEOUT = 10` in `supervisor/deploy_health_check.py`, leaving `HEALTH_CHECK_CANARY_TIMEOUT` untouched (out of scope). It reran the existing `supervisor/test_deploy_health_check.py` suite (13 tests, all pass) to confirm the comment-only change caused no regression. I then updated the cross-session memory file `project_http_timeout_comment_missing.md` (already marked RESOLVED by the workflow) and refreshed its one-line entry in `MEMORY.md` to reflect resolution. \ No newline at end of file -- libgit2 0.21.4