From a003b4c5f08f12186b3ce048140927206f509fc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: graphlemon Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 00:53:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] graphlemon: brd artifact for task 4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b --- .graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/brd.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/brd.md diff --git a/.graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/brd.md b/.graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/brd.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a8b243b --- /dev/null +++ b/.graphlemon/runs/4fda1803-3ee0-40c8-8209-b0baef56d54b/brd.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The planner Work Node workflow completed. It investigated src/scheduler.py:78 (_BUSY_TIMEOUT_MS = 30000), confirmed there's no rationale comment directly above the constant (the explanation only lives in the module docstring ~50 lines above), and — staying within the Planner role (no direct business-code edits) — produced a BRD packaging this as a single one-line Development Unit for a Code Agent: add a `#` comment directly above the constant referencing the existing docstring rationale about concurrent sqlite writers retrying instead of raising "database is locked". The BRD includes explicit acceptance criteria (single-line diff only, constant value unchanged, rest of file byte-identical, no test needed for a trivial comment). + +It also updated its own agent memory (.claude/agent-memory/planner/project_scheduler_busy_timeout_comment_missing.md plus the MEMORY.md index) to record the gap and the "don't self-edit source, package as a Unit for Code Agent" pattern. + +Current repo state: only planner memory files changed (one new untracked memory file, MEMORY.md modified) — nothing staged or committed, and no .graphlemon/runs/ artifact was created since this was a lightweight verify-and-plan check rather than a full BRD→PRD→SDD→Benchmark pipeline run. \ No newline at end of file -- libgit2 0.21.4