From 3a9fdf24de0f8eb6ae23a03580a1a24babdecfbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: graphlemon Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 23:20:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] graphlemon: sdd artifact for task 14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb --- .graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/sdd.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/sdd.md diff --git a/.graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/sdd.md b/.graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/sdd.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d88e7a --- /dev/null +++ b/.graphlemon/runs/14fd9ab6-e2c8-4233-8381-002419de85bb/sdd.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The graphlemon planner Work Node workflow completed. It investigated a claimed off-by-one bug (`loop_round > 3` vs `>= 3` in p_org_task_lifecycle) and found the bug does not exist: src/org_loop_route.py:102 already uses `>= _LOOP_LIMIT`, docs/sdd/04-P-流程与状态流转.md:20 specifies `>= 3` consistently, and src/test_org_loop_route.py's LoopLimitTest already covers and passes this exact boundary. The only mention of `> 3` is a hypothetical illustrative scenario in docs/self-development-feasibility.md:50 used to argue PH5 self-hosting feasibility, not a real defect report. + +Result: no code or doc changes made, no new Development Unit created (correctly avoided manufacturing busywork). It produced a "verified-closed" SDD documenting the fact-check chain, and flagged two open questions for the user to decide rather than deciding itself: (1) whether to still run the gated real self-hosting E2E test (RUN_REAL_SELF_HOSTING_E2E=1), and (2) whether this "checked and found no bug" outcome is itself the desired proof of the Planner's fact-checking capability, or whether the user intended to supply a task with an actual bug for a real fix-and-verify loop. \ No newline at end of file -- libgit2 0.21.4