From 2d3baada38a3d8d69f317f79368229f96fa35d90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: graphlemon Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 00:10:25 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] graphlemon: brd artifact for task 16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8 --- .graphlemon/runs/16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8/brd.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .graphlemon/runs/16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8/brd.md diff --git a/.graphlemon/runs/16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8/brd.md b/.graphlemon/runs/16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8/brd.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5066277 --- /dev/null +++ b/.graphlemon/runs/16f1d360-5117-40bf-98e6-0821058a61b8/brd.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +The graphlemon planner workflow (task w14ck9zm3) completed. It produced a BRD scoping a single, low-risk change: add one clarifying comment above `_LOOP_LIMIT = 3` in `src/org_loop_route.py`, explaining it's the loop_round boundary required by REQ-05/REQ-09 (docs/sdd/06-验收与测试锚点.md) that triggers `blocked_pending_human`. + +Scope: one file, one new comment line, no logic changes, no other files touched, no new tests needed (existing regression tests already cover the behavior). Acceptance: `git diff` shows exactly that one added line, and `src/test_org_loop_route.py` still passes. + +The PL self-review concluded this is unitary and low-risk enough to hand directly to the Coder agent without further breakdown. No code has been changed yet — this was the Planner stage only; awaiting direction on whether to proceed to implementation. \ No newline at end of file -- libgit2 0.21.4