graphlemon-node-5c8e25509a324a2fb3ef06184600bbd0.js 4.07 KB
export const meta = { name: "graphlemon-node-5c8e25509a324a2fb3ef06184600bbd0", description: 'graphlemon Work Node (planner)' }

const result = await agent("Here is the approved BRD for goal '\u5f00\u53d1 graph \u9875\u9762\uff0c\u663e\u793a org graph \u548c work graph \u7684\u8bbe\u8ba1\u56fe\u5f62\uff0c\u6267\u884c\u72b6\u6001\uff0c\u663e\u793a\u8282\u70b9\u548c\u8fb9\uff0c\u70b9\u51fb\u8282\u70b9\u53ef\u4ee5\u770b\u5230\u5177\u4f53 agent \u65e5\u5fd7\uff0c\u56fe\u5f62\u4e0b\u9762\u8981\u5c55\u793aplanner \u7684\u6240\u6709\u7ed3\u679c\uff0c\u5305\u62ec\u8f93\u51fa\u7684\u5404\u7c7b\u6587\u6863\u5217\u8868\uff0c\u5404\u7c7b\u4ee3\u7801\u5217\u8868\uff0c\u5404\u7c7bgraph \u56fe\u5f62\u5217\u8868\uff0c\u5404\u7c7btask \u4efb\u52a1\u91cc\u8bf6\u5b9d':\n\nThe graphlemon-node planner workflow completed. It produced a BRD for a new \"Graph \u9875\u9762\" feature (Org Graph / Work Graph visualization + output overview) for the graphlemon frontend console.\n\nKey points:\n- Scope: new standalone route (suggested `#/graph`) showing (1) the static Org Graph topology (planner\u2192coder\u2192validator with loop-back edges), (2) the selected task's Work Graph (nodes/edges, live status), (3) click-to-expand agent logs per node (today only hover tooltips exist), and (4) a results overview below with four filterable lists: docs (BRD/PRD/SDD/Benchmark), code diffs, historical Work Graph run snapshots, and the task list.\n- Grounded in actual code, not stale docs: found that docs/sdd/02-V references a wireframe prototype file that doesn't actually exist in the repo (flagged as stale), confirmed today's graph visualization is only an embedded component on the task-detail page, and confirmed there's no backend endpoint to list work_graph_runs across tasks (real new backend work for FR-5c).\n- Open questions before moving to PRD: (1) does \"Planner \u7684\u6240\u6709\u7ed3\u679c\" mean all pipeline outputs or strictly Planner-only artifacts (BRD defaults to \"all outputs\"); (2) should the four result lists be full inline views or summary+links to existing pages (defaults to summary+links, YAGNI); (3) should the new route avoid naming collision with the existing v_graph_visualizer component.\n\nFull BRD markdown is available in the task output file at /private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-yibo-Documents-lemonAI-graphlemon-frontend/62a4310d-f7d4-4d80-921d-3c350b1a62ee/tasks/wsxuyxo5x.output. Next step is for the user to resolve the open questions or approve the stated defaults before proceeding to PRD.\n\nWrite the PRD (Product Requirement Document) based on this BRD. Reply with the document content (Markdown) via the required schema.\n\nA consistency reviewer flagged issues with your previous draft: Contradictory scope for click-to-expand-log on the shared `v_graph_visualizer` component. Section 0 (\"BRD \u5f85\u786e\u8ba4\u95ee\u9898\u5904\u7406\", point 3) and FR-4's implementation note both frame the click listener as being added directly to `.work-node[data-node-exec-id]` inside the same shared `mountGraphVisualizerTooltips()`/rendering code that `v_task_detail` already embeds (\"v_graph_visualizer...\u672c\u6b21\u53ea\u6269\u5c55\u5176\u4ea4\u4e92\u80fd\u529b\uff08\u65b0\u589e click \u4e8b\u4ef6\uff09\"), which would make the click-to-expand behavior appear in `v_task_detail` too as a side effect. But Section 7's proposed 02-V doc addition explicitly states the opposite: \"click \u884c\u4e3a\u4e3a\u540e\u8005\uff08v_graph_console\uff09\u65b0\u589e\uff0c\u524d\u8005\uff08v_task_detail\uff09\u82e5\u672a\u6765\u4e5f\u60f3\u8981\u8be5\u884c\u4e3a\u53ef\u76f4\u63a5\u590d\u7528\u540c\u4e00\u5b9e\u73b0\" \u2014 i.e. `v_task_detail` does NOT get this behavior now and would need a separate future change to add it. The PRD never introduces a page-scoping/conditional mechanism to reconcile 'same shared component code gets the click handler' with 'only one of its two host pages actually exhibits the click behavior', so these two descriptions of the same change cannot both hold.\nProduce a corrected version resolving these issues.", { agentType: "planner", schema: {"type": "object", "required": ["content"]} })

return result