{
  "skill_name": "ceo_leadership",
  "skill_description": "CEO战略管理与领导力（战略规划、OKR管理、团队建设、任务委派）",
  "dataset_version": "1.0.0",
  "created_at": "2026-03-24",
  "created_by": "digester",
  "benchmark": {
    "version": "v1.0",
    "dimensions": [
      {"name": "战略框架完整性", "weight": 0.20},
      {"name": "OKR体系规范性", "weight": 0.20},
      {"name": "方法论可操作性", "weight": 0.15},
      {"name": "案例支撑度", "weight": 0.15},
      {"name": "理论体系深度", "weight": 0.15},
      {"name": "适用性广度", "weight": 0.15}
    ],
    "thresholds": {
      "pass_score": 70,
      "industry_avg_score": 65,
      "elite_avg_score": 78
    }
  },
  "samples": [
    {
      "id": "good_01",
      "filename": "good_01_huawei_blm.md",
      "title": "华为战略规划方法论(BLM)",
      "source": "elite_03_huawei_blm.md",
      "category": "good",
      "score": 85,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 95,
        "OKR体系规范性": 70,
        "方法论可操作性": 90,
        "案例支撑度": 95,
        "理论体系深度": 85,
        "适用性广度": 75
      },
      "tags": ["BLM", "华为", "战略规划", "战略解码", "差距分析"],
      "key_concepts": ["双差分析", "业务设计五要素", "蓝军机制", "战略预备队"]
    },
    {
      "id": "good_02",
      "filename": "good_02_google_okr.md",
      "title": "Google OKR实践深度解析",
      "source": "elite_04_google_okr_practice.md",
      "category": "good",
      "score": 81,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 60,
        "OKR体系规范性": 95,
        "方法论可操作性": 85,
        "案例支撑度": 95,
        "理论体系深度": 80,
        "适用性广度": 75
      },
      "tags": ["OKR", "Google", "目标管理", "绩效", "透明度"],
      "key_concepts": ["60-70%理想完成度", "全员透明", "双向结合", "容错文化"]
    },
    {
      "id": "good_03",
      "filename": "good_03_bytedance_okr.md",
      "title": "字节跳动OKR实践",
      "source": "elite_05_bytedance_okr.md",
      "category": "good",
      "score": 77,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 55,
        "OKR体系规范性": 90,
        "方法论可操作性": 85,
        "案例支撑度": 90,
        "理论体系深度": 75,
        "适用性广度": 70
      },
      "tags": ["OKR", "字节跳动", "飞书", "信息透明", "自我驱动"],
      "key_concepts": ["短周期迭代", "飞阅会", "动态调整", "结果导向"]
    },
    {
      "id": "good_04",
      "filename": "good_04_welch_leadership.md",
      "title": "杰克·韦尔奇战略领导力",
      "source": "elite_02_jack_welch_leadership.md",
      "category": "good",
      "score": 76,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 85,
        "OKR体系规范性": 50,
        "方法论可操作性": 80,
        "案例支撑度": 95,
        "理论体系深度": 85,
        "适用性广度": 70
      },
      "tags": ["领导力", "GE", "韦尔奇", "变革管理", "人才管理"],
      "key_concepts": ["4E+1P", "数一数二", "无边界组织", "271活力曲线"]
    },
    {
      "id": "good_05",
      "filename": "good_05_okr_guide.md",
      "title": "CEO如何制定OKR",
      "source": "elite_01_okr_ceo_guide.md",
      "category": "good",
      "score": 71,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 60,
        "OKR体系规范性": 90,
        "方法论可操作性": 85,
        "案例支撑度": 60,
        "理论体系深度": 60,
        "适用性广度": 70
      },
      "tags": ["OKR", "CEO", "目标制定", "SMART", "复盘"],
      "key_concepts": ["OKR五步法", "SMART原则", "三层跟踪体系", "战略对齐"]
    },
    {
      "id": "bad_01",
      "filename": "bad_01_delegation_basics.md",
      "title": "任务委派基础方法",
      "source": "avg_01_delegation_basics.md",
      "category": "bad",
      "score": 40,
      "scores": {
        "战略框架完整性": 40,
        "OKR体系规范性": 20,
        "方法论可操作性": 60,
        "案例支撑度": 30,
        "理论体系深度": 40,
        "适用性广度": 50
      },
      "tags": ["委派", "基础", "管理", "网络资源"],
      "key_concepts": ["五步法", "任务分配"],
      "issues": ["无真实案例", "无框架支撑", "深度不足", "无工具模板"]
    }
  ],
  "statistics": {
    "total_samples": 6,
    "good_samples": 5,
    "bad_samples": 1,
    "average_score": 71.7,
    "good_average": 78.0,
    "bad_average": 40.0,
    "score_distribution": {
      "80+": 2,
      "70-79": 3,
      "60-69": 0,
      "50-59": 0,
      "<50": 1
    }
  },
  "insights": {
    "good_common_features": [
      "使用成熟框架（BLM、OKR、4E+1P）",
      "真实企业案例支撑（华为、Google、字节、GE）",
      "清晰的方法论步骤和工具",
      "权威来源（商学院、企业官方）",
      "长期实践验证（20年+）"
    ],
    "bad_common_issues": [
      "无战略框架支撑",
      "无真实企业案例",
      "停留在概念层面",
      "缺乏可操作工具",
      "适用性不明确"
    ],
    "key_findings": [
      "案例支撑度是区分Good/Bad的关键（87 vs 30）",
      "战略框架完整性是最难达成的维度（Good平均仅69）",
      "方法论可操作性是Good样本的共同优势（平均85）",
      "来源可信度与内容质量高度正相关"
    ]
  }
}